Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Institutional Div., Cross-Appellee, 998 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Betty Lou Beets, Cross-Appellant v. James A. Collins, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Institutional Div., Cross-Appellee, 998 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“palomo's request for specific performance, if granted, would entitle him to vacation of the sentence and resentencing before a different judge, with the benefit of a 5k1.1 motion by the government.”
50 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Spencer (ca5, 2025-11-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Spencer
5th Cir. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
palomo's request for specific performance, if granted, would entitle him to vacation of the sentence and resentencing before a different judge, with the benefit of a 5k1.1 motion by the government.
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Salim Balouch
5th Cir. · 2020 · confidence medium
See United States v. Akins, 746 F.3d 590, 609-10 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257-58 (5th Cir. 1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Williams
5th Cir. · 2016 · confidence medium
In a different case, the court said that a defendant whose plea agreement was breached “has the option of seeking one of two remedies on appeal: (1) specific performance, which requires that the sentence be vacated and that the defendant be resentenced by a different judge; or (2) withdrawal of the guilty plea, and the opportunity to plead anew, which requires vacation of both the conviction and the sentence.” United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Jehoni Williams
5th Cir. · 2016 · confidence medium
Id. at 768 (quoting United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir.1993)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Rodriguez
5th Cir. · 2010 · confidence medium
As support for the different-judge requirement, our court cited Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 263 , 92 S.Ct. 495 , 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971) (requiring that defendant who seeks to have his sentence vacated for breach of a plea agreement be re-sentenced by a different judge, though the original judge committed no error), and United States v. Saling, 205 F.3d 764, 768 (5th Cir.2000) (holding such a defendant may choose between “specific performance [of the plea agreement], which requires that the sentence be vacated and that the defendant be resentenced by a different judge; or ... withdra…
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Estrada-Perez
5th Cir. · 2006 · confidence medium
United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 937 , 114 S.Ct. 358 , 126 L.Ed.2d 322 (1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Carter
5th Cir. · 2003 · confidence medium
Saling, 205 F.3d at 767-68 (5th Cir. 2000); United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Lee
5th Cir. · 2002 · confidence medium
P. 32(e); United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Sanford
5th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir. 1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States of America v. Alvin Peterson, Sr. (2×)
10th Cir. · 2000 · confidence medium
Compare United States v. Thayer, 204 F.3d 1352, 1356 (11th Cir. 2000); United States v. Hicks, 129 F.3d 376, 378 (7th Cir. 1997); United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir. 1993); United States v. Fant, 974 F.2d 559, 562 (4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Flores-Payon, 942 F.2d 556, 560 (9th Cir. 1991); United States v. Benson, 836 F.2d 1133, 1135 (8th Cir. 1988) with United States v. Lawlor, 168 F.3d 633, 636 (2d Cir. 1999); United States v. Courtois, 131 F.3d 937 , 938 & n.2 (10th Cir. 1997); United States v. Moscahlaidis, 868 F.2d 1357, 1360 (3d Cir. 1989).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Robert Daniel Saling, Jr.
5th Cir. · 2000 · confidence medium
United States v. Ewing, 480 F.2d 1141 (5th Cir.1973). 14 . 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Diana Gonzales Buchanan, Fedell Anderson, Vernon Bonner, and John Buchanan
5th Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 258 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 358 , 126 L.Ed.2d 322 (1993); United States v. Ponce, 917 F.2d 841, 842 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 940 , 111 S.Ct. 1398 , 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Zuniga
5th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 358 , 126 L.Ed.2d 322 (1993).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Sheila Smith and Byron Vandrea Phillips, A/K/A Vincent Andrian Phillips, A/K/A Byron A. Phillips (2×)
5th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 258 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 358 , 126 L.Ed.2d 322 (1993); United States v. Mitchell, 964 F.2d 454, 457 (5th Cir.1992) 12 See Evbuomwan, 992 F.2d at 74 13 U.S.S.G.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Eli Palacios (2×)
5th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257-58 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Tavarez-Modesto
5th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253 , 257-58 (5th Cir.1993); U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment, (n.4).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Craig
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257-58 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Crenshaw
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 255-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 358 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Garcia
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir. 1993) (holding that the defendant was an organizer because 1 Garcia concedes that at least five persons participated in the drug trafficking scheme. -3- he attended an important meeting with a person “responsible for transporting large shipments of cocaine.”) Garcia additionally told the confidential informant that he had a contact in Florida who could help out in transporting the drugs should one of the conspirators falter.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Branam
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Castaneda
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Posada-Rios
5th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir.1993). 8.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Posada-Rios
5th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257 (5th Cir.1993). 8.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Palomo
5th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 256-57 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 358 , 126 L.Ed.2d 322 (1993).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lee W. Roberts, Also Known as Kurlee Roberts, Also Known as Dr. Lee Susan Byers and Jackie Wood
10th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Palomo, 998 F.2d 253, 257-58 (5th Cir.) (no error in rejecting defendant’s argument his father’s role as organizer of drug conspiracy led to his § 3B1.1(b) increase where defendant met with drug transporter, participated in shipping drugs, recruited a coconspirator, and travelled to Mexico to pay a bribe), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 358 , 126 L.Ed.2d 322 (1993); United States v. Pofahl, 990 F.2d 1456, 1481 (5th Cir.) (no error in applying § 3B1.1(b) to organizer’s wife who negotiated price, recruited other conspirators, and directed other members), cert. d…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Chaim Levy
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Beets v. Collins, 986 F.2d 1478, 1483-84 (5th Cir.) (discussing the universal applicability of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cuyler), reh’g en banc granted, 998 F.2d 253 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gilliam
W.D. Va. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Beets v. Collins, 986 F.2d 1478 (5th Cir.1993), reh’g granted, 998 F.2d 253 (5th Cir.1993) (requiring a showing that an attorney actively represented conflicting interests “stems from the concern that potential conflicts will be dressed up as Sixth Amendment violations”).
Betty Lou BEETS, Petitioner-Appellee Cross-Appellant,
v.
James A. COLLINS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellant Cross-Appellee
91-4606.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 5, 1993.
998 F.2d 253
William C. Zapalac, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dan Morales, Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for respondent-appellant, cross-appellee., Joe Margulies, Robert L. MeGlasson, TX Resource Center, Austin, TX, for petitioner-appellee, cross-appellant.
Politz, King, Garwood, Jolly, Higginbotham, Davis, Jones, Smith, Duhé, Wiener, Barksdale, Garza, Demoss.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.