green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
16.7 score
“he first amendment . . . bars . . . state action which compels individuals to speak or express a certain point of view.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Benson v. Piper
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
he first amendment . . . bars . . . state action which compels individuals to speak or express a certain point of view.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Cook v. Gralike
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
I, § 6, cl. 1, of the Federal Constitution, Article VIII "establishes a regime in which a state officerthe secretary of stateis permitted to judge and punish Members of Congress for their legislative actions or positions." 191 F. 3d, at 922. [9] *518 Although the Court of Appeals' decision is consistent with the views of other courts that have passed on similar voter initiatives, [10] the importance of the case prompted our grant of certiorari. 529 U. S. 1065 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Acceptance Insurance Company v. Granite Reinsurance Company
(2×)
See In re Bridge Information Systems, Inc., 460 F.3d 1041 , 1047 (8th Cir.2006) (citing Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999)).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Acceptance Ins. Companies Inc.
See In re Bridge Information Systems, Inc., 460 F.3d 1041 , 1047 (8th Cir.2006) (citing Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc., Debtor. Gulfcoast Workstation Corporation v. Scott P. Peltz, Plan Administrator on Behalf of Bridge Information Systems, Inc.
See Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999) (citations omitted) (holding that this Court "review[s] judgments, not opinions, and we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, whether . . . that ground was urged below or passed on by the district court").
discussed
Cited "see"
Gulfcoast Workstation Corp. v. Peltz Ex Rel. Bridge Information Systems, Inc. (In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.)
See Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999) (citations omitted) (holding that this Court “review[s] judgments, not opinions, and we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, whether ... that ground was urged below or passed on by the district court”). the benefit of such creditor.” 11 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Bridge Information Systems, Inc., Debtor. Gulfcoast Workstation Corporation v. Scott P. Peltz, Plan Administrator on Behalf of Bridge Information Systems, Inc.
See Harman v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999) (citations omitted) (holding that this Court "review[s] judgments, not opinions, and we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, whether ... that ground was urged below or passed on by the district court").
discussed
Cited "see"
GulfcoastWorkstation v. Scott P. Peltz
See Harman v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999) (citations omitted) (holding that this Court “review[s] judgments, not opinions, and we may affirm on any ground supported by the record, whether ... that ground was urged below or passed on by the district court”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Agre v. Wolf
See, e.g., Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 914 (8th Cir. 1999) (noting proper jurisdiction of Elections Clause case, unrelated to apportionment, adjudicated by single-judge district court).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rakesh Hirani
Co., 707 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir. 2013)); see also Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir. 1999) (affirming the grant of summary *752 judgment on grounds not considered by the district court); United States v. Sager, 743 F.2d 1261 , 1263 n. 4 (8th Cir. 1984) (“We review judgments, not opinions, and we may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record, whether or not that ground was urged below or passed on by the District Court”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas Reuter v. Jax Ltd., Inc.
See also Gralike v. Cook, 191 F.3d 911 , 921 n. 9 (8th Cir.1999) (affirming judgment on grounds not considered by the district court); United States v. Sager, 743 F.2d 1261 , 1263 n. 4 (8th Cir.1984) (“We review judgments, not opinions, and we may affirm a judgment on any ground supported by the record, whether or not that ground was urged below or passed on by the District Court.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deborah WILSON, Appellant,
v.
RENTAL RESEARCH SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, Appellees
v.
RENTAL RESEARCH SERVICES, INC., a Minnesota Corporation, Appellees
97-4386.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jul 16, 1999.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Minnesota (1)
ORDER
Appellees’ petition for rehearing has been considered by the Court en banc and is granted. The opinion and judgment of the court entered on January 19, 1999, are vacated.
The case is set for oral argument before the court en banc at St. Louis, Missouri, September 13, 1999, at 10:00 a.m. Each party is allotted twenty (20) minutes argument per side.