C.H., as Guardian Ad Litem of Z.H. A Minor & C.H. Individually v. Grace Oliva Gail Pratt Patrick Johnson Medford Twp. Bd. of Educ. Leo Klagholtz, Comm'r of Educ. the State of New Jersey Dep't of Educ. (d.c. Civil No. 96-Cv-02768), 197 F.3d 63 (3rd Cir. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
C.H., as Guardian Ad Litem of Z.H. A Minor & C.H. Individually v. Grace Oliva Gail Pratt Patrick Johnson Medford Twp. Bd. of Educ. Leo Klagholtz, Comm'r of Educ. the State of New Jersey Dep't of Educ. (d.c. Civil No. 96-Cv-02768), 197 F.3d 63 (3rd Cir. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Richard Copeland, Also Known as Jamal Owen (ca2, 2004-07-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Richard Copeland, Also Known as Jamal Owen
2d Cir. · 2004 · confidence medium
See Swaby v. Ashcroft, 357 F.3d 156 , 160 n. 8 (2d Cir.2004) (noting that habeas petitions filed by aliens subject to INS Section 106 mooted by deportation); Duran v. Reno, 197 F.3d 63, 63 (2d Cir.1999) (dismissing habeas petition filed by deported alien subject to INA Section 106 as moot).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Roy Swaby v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General
2d Cir. · 2004 · confidence medium
In Duran v. Reno, 197 F.3d 63, 63 (2d Cir.1999), a terse opinion, we did dismiss an immigration appeal as “moot” based on the appellant's deportation.
cited Cited "see" Anthony Simmonds, A/K/A Anthony Simmons v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Duran v. Reno, 197 F.3d 63 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam). 4 .
cited Cited "see" As GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF v. GRACE OLIVA
3rd Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
SEE 197 F.3d 63 , AND 228 F.3d 198 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Downs v. Los Angeles Unified School District
9th Cir. · 2000 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare C.H. v. Oliva, 195 F.3d 167, 172-73 (3d Cir.) ("Hazelwood clearly stands for the proposition that educators may impose non-viewpoint neutral restrictions on the content of student speech in school-sponsored expressive activities so long as those restrictions are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.... [T]he requirement of viewpoint neutrality, while essential to the analysis of a school’s restrictions on extracurricular speech ... is simply not applicable to restrictions on the State's own speech.”), reh’g en banc granted, opinion vacated, 197 F.3d 63 (1999), an…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
C.H., as Guardian Ad Litem of Z.H. A Minor and C.H. Individually
v.
Grace Oliva Gail Pratt Patrick Johnson Medford Township Board of Education Leo Klagholtz, Commissioner of Education the State of New Jersey Department of Education (d.c. Civil No. 96-Cv-02768)
98-5061.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Dec 1, 1999.
197 F.3d 63
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

197 F.3d 63 (3rd Cir. 1999)

C.H., As Guardian Ad Litem of Z.H. A Minor And C.H. Individually, Appellant
v.
GRACE OLIVA; GAIL PRATT; PATRICK JOHNSON; MEDFORD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION; LEO KLAGHOLTZ, Commissioner of Education; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (D.C. Civil No. 96-cv-02768)

No. 98-5061

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Argued June 2, 1999
Filed December 1, 1999

Before: ROTH and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges, and LONGOBARDI, District Judge

Present: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, MANSMANN, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, McKEE, RENDELL, BARRY, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above appeal, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court vacate the opinion and judgment filed October 22, 1999, and list the above for rehearing en banc at the convenience of the Court.