United States v. Jose Guadalupe Serrano-Sanchez, Also Known as Carlos Alvarez, Also Known as Pedro Guerro, Also Known as Antonio Villaescusa-Ibarra, Also Known as Arturo Orosco, Also Known as Jose Sorrano Sanchez, Also Known as Carlos Savala Alvarez, Also Known as Jose Guadalupe Sanchez, 206 F.3d 1300 (8th Cir. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jose Guadalupe Serrano-Sanchez, Also Known as Carlos Alvarez, Also Known as Pedro Guerro, Also Known as Antonio Villaescusa-Ibarra, Also Known as Arturo Orosco, Also Known as Jose Sorrano Sanchez, Also Known as Carlos Savala Alvarez, Also Known as Jose Guadalupe Sanchez, 206 F.3d 1300 (8th Cir. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: David Tourgeman v. Collins Financial Services (ca9, 2014-06-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) David Tourgeman v. Collins Financial Services (2×)
9th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
See, e.g., Hammer, 754 F.3d at 497-99 , 2014 WL 2524534, at *3-4 (action under Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act); Donoghue, 696 F.3d at 174-80 (action under section 16(b) of Securities Exchange Act); Robey , 434 F.3d at 1211—12 (action under FDCPA); DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.2000) (action under Truth in Lending Act).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Rubio v. Capital One Bank (4×)
9th Cir. · 2010 · confidence medium
By contrast, Rubio has standing to bring her TILA claim simply because she "suffered the loss of a statutory right to disclosure." DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.2000). [1] I agree with the majority that the solicitation did not constitute an offer.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hauk v. JP Morgan Chase Bank USA
9th Cir. · 2009 · confidence medium
DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.2000); see also Official *1119 Staff Comm., 12 C.F.R. § 226 , Supp.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Hauk v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank (2×) also: Cited "see"
9th Cir. · 2009 · confidence medium
DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Official Staff 2 Hauk also bases his TILA claim on sections 226.17 and 226.18 of Reg- ulation Z, which are in Subpart C and apply only to closed-end credit transactions.
discussed Cited "see" Creech v. Barrett Financial Group LLC
D. Ariz. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See 4 DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir. 2000) (allowing Plaintiff to proceed 5 in a TILA claim asserted against a creditor); Balderas v. Countrywide Bank, N.A., 664 6 F.3d 787 , 789 (9th Cir. 2011) (same); Abubo v. Bank of N.Y.
discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. Bosco Credit, LLC
N.D. Cal. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir. 5 2000) (“Failure to comply with any requirement imposed under TILA’s credit provisions, 6 including the original and subsequent disclosure requirements imposed by Regulation Z, gives rise 7 to civil liability” in the form of damages under 15 U.S.C. § 1640 (a)); ABC Int’l Traders, Inc. v. 8 Matsushita Elec.
cited Cited "see" Sanford v. Memberworks, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.2000) (reviving plaintiffs motion for class certification when disposition of appeal renders motion “no longer moot”).
cited Cited "see" Patricia Sanford v. Memberworks, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, AKA Mwi Essentials, AKA Mwi Home and Garden, AKA Mwi Connections, AKA Mwi Valuemax West Corporation, a Delaware Corporation West Telemarketing Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Preston Smith Rita Smith, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants
9th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.2000) (reviving plaintiff's motion for class certification when disposition of appeal renders motion "no longer moot").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence medium
See, e.g., DeMando v. Morris, 206 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.2000) (“[Plaintiff] has suffered the loss of a statutory right to disclosure [under the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1693 ] and has therefore suffered injury in fact for purposes of Article III standing.”); see also Graczyk v. W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Jose Guadalupe Serrano-Sanchez, Also Known as Carlos Alvarez, Also Known as Pedro Guerro, Also Known as Antonio Villaescusa-Ibarra, Also Known as Arturo Orosco, Also Known as Jose Sorrano Sanchez, Also Known as Carlos Savala Alvarez, Also Known as Jose Guadalupe Sanchez
00-1629.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Mar 20, 2000.
206 F.3d 1300
Published

206 F.3d 1300 (8th Cir. 2000)

United States of America, Appellee,
v.
Jose Guadalupe Serrano-Sanchez, also known as Carlos Alvarez, also known as Pedro Guerro, also known as Antonio Villaescusa-Ibarra, also known as Arturo Orosco, also known as Jose Sorrano Sanchez, also known as Carlos Savala Alvarez, also known as Jose Guadalupe Sanchez, Appellant.

No. 00-1629 NE

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

Submitted: March 10, 2000
Decided: March 20, 2000

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Before Richard S. Arnold, Beam, and Murphy, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[*~1300]1

Appellant is hereby granted leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to appoint counsel to represent him.

[*~1303]2

The procedure in which a district court certifies that an appeal is not taken in good faith, and denies leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, should be limited to civil cases. In direct criminal appeals, district courts should process a notice of appeal in the ordinary fashion. If counsel believes that the appeal is frivolous, the Anders-Penson procedure should be followed.[1] The Court of Appeals will then determine the course of the appeal.

NOTE:

1

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988).