Aviall Servs. Inc., Plaintiff-Counter v. Cooper Indus. Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee, 278 F.3d 416 (5th Cir. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Aviall Servs. Inc., Plaintiff-Counter v. Cooper Indus. Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee, 278 F.3d 416 (5th Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City of Waukesha v. Viacom, Inc. (wied, 2002-09-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" City of Waukesha v. Viacom, Inc.
E.D. Wis. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aviall Services, Inc. v. Cooper Indus., 263 F.3d 134, 149 (5th Cir.2001), reh’g, en banc, granted by 278 F.3d 416 (5th Cir.2001) (Weiner, J., dissenting) (arguing that the “during or following” language in § 113(f)(1) eschews the restrictions in some jurisdictions that tort-feasors may only seek contribution from each other after judgment has been rendered against them and that the “during or following” language embraces the more expansive Restatement view of contribution).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aviall Services Inc., Plaintiff-Counter
v.
Cooper Industries Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee
00-10197.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 19, 2001.
278 F.3d 416
Published

278 F.3d 416

AVIALL SERVICES INC., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,
v.
COOPER INDUSTRIES INC., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee.

No. 00-10197.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 19, 2001.

Richard Oran Faulk, Gardere Wynne Sewell, Houston, TX, Cynthia J. Bishop, Gardere Wynne Sewell, Dallas, TX, for Aviall Services Inc.

Dale E. Stephenson, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Cleveland, OH, Elizabeth Ellen Mack, Locke Liddell & Sapp, Dallas, TX, for Cooper Industries Inc.

Paul Stanley Weiland, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Washington, DC, for United States, Amicus Curiae.

Tracy Don Hester, Timothy A. Wilkins, Bracewell & Patterson, Houston, TX, for Amer Petro Inst., American Chemistry Council and Texas Oil & Gas Association, Amici Curiae.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Sidney A. Fitzwater, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion August 14, 2001, 5 Cir., 2001, 263 F.3d 134)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER, DENNIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.