green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Constance Copeland v. Eric K. Shinseki
Inc. v. Abraham, 314 F.3d 1299, 1304 (Fed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ELAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and Athena Neurosciences, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, Defendant-Appellee
v.
MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, Defendant-Appellee
00-1467.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dec 18, 2002.
Lynn H. Pasahow, Fenwick & West LLP, of Palo Alto, CA, filed a response to the petition for rehearing for plaintiffs-appellants. Of counsel on the response were Beth H. Parker, and S. Christian Platt, Bingham McCutchen, LLP, of San Francisco, CA., Robert E. Hillman, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Boston, MA, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc for defendant-appellee. Of counsel on the petition were Shelley K. Wessels, Karen I. Boyd, and Kurtis D. MacFerrin, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Redwood City, CA. Also of counsel was Chad A. Hanson, Fish & Richardson, P.C., of Minneapolis, MN.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
A combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc having been filed by the Appellee, a response thereto having been invited by the court and filed by the Appellants, the petition for panel rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and response having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service, and a poll having been requested and taken,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The petition for panel rehearing is denied.
(2) The petition for rehearing en banc is granted.
(3) Acting en banc, the court vacates the panel’s judgment and original opinion entered August 30, 2002, Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Mayo Foundation, 304 F.3d 1221 (Fed.Cir.2002).