Jarrard v. Dep't of Just., 669 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Jarrard v. Dep't of Just., 669 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bumgardner v. Navy (cafc, 2024-05-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Bumgardner v. Navy
Fed. Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 1160 ; see Jar- rard, 669 F.3d at 1323.
cited Cited "see" Bumgardner v. Navy
Fed. Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
Id. at 1160 ; see Jar- rard, 669 F.3d at 1323.
discussed Cited "see" Joseph Early v. Office of Personnel Management
MSPB · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
The petitioner states that the regulation violates 5 U.S.C. § 1104 “for failing to set standards,” see 0011 RF, Tab 9 at 19, but that argument also appears to be contradicted by Patterson, which effectively 7 OPM regulations provide that, when candidates for an excepted-service position are evaluated without numerical rankings, the hiring agency must use the veterans’ preference as a “plus factor.” 5 C.F.R. § 302.201 (b); see Patterson, 424 F.3d at 1158-59 . 9 validates the “positive factor test” as the standard applicable to consideration of preference-eligible applicants for …
cited Cited "see" Dean v. Department of Labor
Fed. Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jarrard v. Dep’t of Justice, 669 F.3d 1320 (Fed.Cir.2012); Gingery v. Dep’t of Def., 550 F.3d 1347 (Fed.Cir.2008); Patterson, 424 F.3d 1151 .
discussed Cited "see" John F. Bazan, Esq. v. Department of the Army (2×)
MSPB · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jarrard v. Social Security Administration, 115 M.S.P.R. 397 , ¶ 26 (2010), aff’d, 669 F.3d 1320 (Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Durden v. Colvin
M.D. Penn. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Jarrard v. Dep’t of Justice, 669 F.3d 1320 , 1321 (Fed.Cir.2012) (80 percent rating qualifying for federal hiring preference under 5 U.S.C. § 2108 (S)(C)); Spence v. Foxx, 159 F.Supp.3d 483, 487-88 (D.N.J. 2014), appeal dismissed (Mar. 19, 2015); (Title Redacted by Agency), Bd. Vet.App. 1524856 (June 10, 2015) (finding only 70 percent PTSD rating warranted for employed veteran); (Title Redacted by Agency), Bd. Vet.App. 1513531 (Mar. 30, 2015) (granting a veteran 70 percent rating for PTSD while “still employed and [having] a good relationship with his wife and child”); (Title …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McCleary v. Colvin
M.D. Penn. · 2016 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Jarrard v. Dep’t of Justice, 669 F.3d 1320 , 1321 (Fed.Cir. 2012) (80 percent rating qualifying for federal hiring preference under 5 U.S.C. § 2108 (3)(C)); Spence v. Foxx, 159 F.Supp.3d 483, 488 (D.N.J. 2014), appeal dismissed (Mar. 19, 2015); (Title Redacted by Agency), Bd. Vet.App. 1524856 (June 10, 2015) (finding only 70 percent PTSD rating warranted for employed veteran); (Title Redacted by Agency), Bd. Vet.App. 1513531 (Mar. 30, 2015) (granting a veteran 70 percent rating for PTSD while “still employed and [having] a good relationship with his wife and child”); (Title Re…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jarrard
v.
Department of Justice
2011-3050.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mar 31, 2011.
669 F.3d 1320
Unpublished

NOTE: This order is n0nprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit THOMAS G. JARRARD, Petitio_ner, V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Resp0ndent. THOMAS G. JARRARD, Petitioner, V. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Resp0nden,t. 2011-3050, -3051 Petit;i0ns for review of the Merit Systems Pr0tecti0n B0ard in case n0s. SF3330100815-I-1 and SF3330100024 1-1. ON MOTION ORDER

JARRARD V. JUSTICE 2 Upon consideration of ThoInas G. Jarrard’s unopposed motion to consolidate appeal nos. 2011-3050 and 2011- 3051, lT IS ORDERED THAT2 (1) The motion is granted The revised official cap- tion is reflected above. (2) Jarrard’s consolidated initial brief is due within 40 days from the date of filing of this order. FoR THE COURT 1‘1AR 3 1 2011 /s/ J an Horba1y Date J an Horbaly C1erk cc: Thomas G. Jarrard latin Anuj Vohra, Esq. \l.S. C0lJR’f 0F APPEALS F8R Tl'lE FEDFFAl. ClRCll1T 819 mar-11 2011 .IA||I'l9RBAlY G|.EIIl