green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.6 score
“as commander-in-chief, is authorized to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed by law at his command, and to employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1900 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1900
1963
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Khalid v. Bush
as commander-in-chief, is authorized to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed by law at his command, and to employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy.
cited
Cited "see"
Straneri v. United States
See Fleming v. Page, 1850, 9 How. 603, 614, 615 , 50 U.S. 603, 614-615 , 13 L.Ed. 276 ; De Lima v. Bidwell, 1901, 182 U.S. 1, 182 , 21 S.Ct. 743 , 45 L.Ed. 1041 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bancoult, Olivier v. McNamara, Robert S.
See also Fleming v. Page, 50 U.S. (9 How.) 603, 615 , 13 L.Ed. 276 (1850) (stating that as Commander in Chief of the nation’s military forces, the President may "employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Falen Gherebi v. George Walker Bush Donald H. Rumsfeld
(2×)
See United States v. Rice, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 246, 254 , 4 L.Ed. 562 (1819) (hostile occupation gives "firm possession" and the "fullest rights of sovereignty" to the occupying power, while suspending the sovereign authority of the land whose territory is being occupied); Cobb v. U.S., 191 F.2d 604, 608 (9th Cir.1951) (an occupying power may acquire sovereignty through an act of formal annexation or "an expression of intention to retain the conquered territory permanently"); see also Fleming v. Page, 50 U.S. (9 How.) 603, 614 , 13 L.Ed. 276 (1850) (the U.S. had "sovereignty and dominion" over …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson
v.
Aaron Ross, Who Sues for the Use of Robert Patterson
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1850.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
Order.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript, of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire,.of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.