green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.4 score
“... we have held that when we vacate a sentence and remand for re-sentencing, the sentence becomes void in its entirety and the district court is free to revisit any rulings it made at the initial sentencing.”
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Mahmoud Eldick
... we have held that when we vacate a sentence and remand for re-sentencing, the sentence becomes void in its entirety and the district court is free to revisit any rulings it made at the initial sentencing.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mauerhan v. Principi
in construing a statute or regulation, we commence by inspecting its language to ascertain its plain meaning.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angulo-Valenzuela
See United States v. Roberts, 185 F.3d 1125, 1144 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1960 , 146 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.
In short, “even a creek which is dry for months may constitute a tributary that is a Water of the United States.” San Francisco Baykeeper, 791 F.Supp.2d at 763 ; see, e.g., Driscoll v. Adams, 181 F.3d 1285, 1291 (11th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1961 , 146 L.Ed.2d 793 (2000) (holding that a stream is still a “navigable water” under the CWA “even if it flows only intermittently.”); U.S. v. Tex. Pipe Line Co., 528 F.Supp. 728, 731 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abbott Laboratories v. United States
See Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2518, 2536 , 168 L.Ed.2d 467 (2007) (regulation should not be read “in a way that makes part of it redundant”); Jewett v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 455 U.S. 305, 316 , 102 S.Ct. 1082 , 71 L.Ed.2d 170 (1982) (same); see also Glover v. West, 185 F.3d 1328, 1332 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1960 , 146 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Neighbors for Rational Development, Inc. v. Norton
See also United States v. Roberts, 185 F.3d 1125 , 1134 n. 7 (10th Cir.1999) (noting McAl-pine "expressly rejected” Florida's holding that "the decision to acquire land [in trust for Indians] is one within the Secretary’s discretion”), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1960 , 146 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Frank
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Roberts, 185 F.3d 1125, 1132-33 (10th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1960 , 146 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000) (applying the Venetie two-prong test in a criminal case); Blunk v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., 177 F.3d 879 , 883-84 (9th Cir.1999) (applying the Venetie two-prong test in a civil case); Thompson, 127 F.Supp.2d at 156-58 (civil case); Malabed v. N. Slope Borough, 42 F.Supp.2d 927, 932-33 (D.Alaska 1999) (civil case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Dependency of JWH
See also In re Welfare of H.S., 94 Wash.App. 511 , 973 P.2d 474 , review denied, 138 Wash.2d 1019 , 989 P.2d 1140 (1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1960 , 146 L.Ed.2d 792 (2000) (parental rights terminated where child had been in foster care for six years since infancy and parents still not capable because of chronic mental illness). [23] See also In re Dependency of K.R., 75 Wash. App. 781 , 880 P.2d 88 (1994); In re Welfare of Baby Girl Coverdell, 30 Wash.App. 677 , 637 P.2d 991 (1981) (in a dependency proceeding, the State initially attempts to reconstruct the family unit). [2…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Buday
See also Driscoll v. Adams, 181 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1108 , 120 S.Ct. 1961 , 146 L.Ed.2d 793 (2000) (citing Eidson and holding that an intermittently flowing tributary of a tributary of the Tennessee River was subject to federal jurisdiction). 13 .
LaFargue
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-1165.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 2000.
529 U.S. 1108
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1) · Veterans Claims (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.