Mauler v. Bayfield Cnty., Wisconsin, 538 U.S. 1032 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Mauler v. Bayfield Cnty., Wisconsin, 538 U.S. 1032 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“sjervices that are reasonably likely to provide an identifiable, tangible and material benefit to the debtor's estate can be compensated, even if they do not actually provide such a benefit....”
40 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Wireless Telecommunications Inc. (pamb, 2011-04-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) In Re Wireless Telecommunications Inc.
Bankr. M.D. Penn. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
sjervices that are reasonably likely to provide an identifiable, tangible and material benefit to the debtor's estate can be compensated, even if they do not actually provide such a benefit....
discussed Cited "see" Osherow v. Porras (In Re Porras)
Bankr. W.D. Tex. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally In re Hannover Corp., 310 F.3d 796, 802 (5th Cir.2002), ce rt. denied, 538 U.S. 1032 , 123 S.Ct. 2075 , 155 L.Ed.2d 1060 (2003) (short-term call options were not without "value” simply because there was no chance that debtor, who used options to facilitate Ponzi scheme, would exercise options). 13 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pelum
D. Kan. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Ruling: Under Guideline § 2T1.1 (b)(2), a defendant convicted of tax evasion should receive a two-level enhancement for "especially complex or especially intricate offense conduct in which deliberate steps are taken to make the offense, or its extent, difficult to detect." "Conduct such as hiding assets or transactions, or both, through the use of fictitious entities, corporate shells, or offshore bank accounts ordinarily indicates sophisticated concealment." See U.S.S.G. § 2T1.1 (b)(2) comment, (n. 4); see, e.g., United States v. Butler, 297 F.3d 505 (6th Cir.2002) (enhancement for defendan…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pflum
D. Kan. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Ruling: Under Guideline § 2T1.1 (b)(2), a defendant convicted of tax evasion should receive a two-level enhancement for “especially complex or especially intricate offense conduct in which deliberate steps are taken to make the offense, or its extent, difficult to detect.” “Conduct such as hiding assets or transactions, or both, through the use of fictitious entities, corporate shells, or offshore bank accounts ordinarily indicates sophisticated concealment.” See U.S.S.G. § 2T1.1 (b)(2) comment, (n. 4); see, e.g., United States v. Butler, 297 F.3d 505 (6th Cir.2002) (enhancement for …
Mauler
v.
Bayfield County, Wisconsin
02-1316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 2003.
538 U.S. 1032
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: M.D. Pennsylvania (1)

538 U.S. 1032

MAULER ET AL.
v.
BAYFIELD COUNTY, WISCONSIN.

No. 02-1316.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 19, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 309 F. 3d 997.