green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.4 score
“it is for the trial eourt to determine, in the exercise of its discretion, whether the expert's sources of information are sufficiently reliable to warrant reception of the opinion”
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Toys \R\" US
it is for the trial eourt to determine, in the exercise of its discretion, whether the expert's sources of information are sufficiently reliable to warrant reception of the opinion
discussed
Cited "see"
E.W. French & Sons, Inc., a California Corporation v. General Portland Inc., a Delaware Corporation, E.W. French & Sons, Inc., a California Corporation v. General Portland Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Black, 767 F.2d at 1342 . 28 General Portland unpersuasively relies on Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Richards v. Nielsen Freight Lines
See Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 210 (9th Cir.1957), ce rt. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. White
(2×)
See Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958); Exclusive Florists, Inc. v. Kahn, 17 Cal. App.3d 711 , 95 Cal. Rptr. 325 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation
See Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188,219 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975, 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958); Vandervelde v. Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Ass’n, 344 F.Supp. 118, 150-151 (S.D.N.Y. 1972); Annot., 16 A.L.R.F. 14 at § 20; 5 Proof of Facts, Goodwill 507 (1960); W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Florida Canal Industries, Inc. v. Rambo
Accord, Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 214 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958): A memorandum or record cannot be considered as having been made in the “regular course” of business, within the meaning of § 1732, unless it was made by an authorized person, to record information known to him or supplied by another authorized person.
cited
Cited "see"
Shumate & Company, Inc. v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Shumate & Company, Inc. v. American Stock Exchange
See Standard Oil Co. of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 212-218 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Ai Baumler and Shirley Thompson Baumler, His Wife v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Ai Baumler and Shirley Thompson Baumler, His Wife v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
See, e.q., Standard Oil v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 198 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958)
cited
Cited "see"
Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.
See Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 217-218 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corporation
See Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 217-218 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U. S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958). 59 After the case was set for trial the court conducted a final series of pre-trial conferences for the purpose of ascertaining the nature of the proof and to settle the trial agenda.
discussed
Cited "see"
Niederkrome v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
See Parish's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 7 Cir., 187 F.2d 390 , 395-396 6 '* * * any writing or record, whether in the form of an entry in a book or otherwise, made as a memorandum or record of any act, transaction, * * * shall be admissible as evidence of such act, transaction, * * * if made in the regular course of any business, and if it was the regular course of such business to make such memorandum or record at the time of such act, transaction * * * or within a reasonable time thereafter.' 28 U.S.C.A. 1732 7 Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 9 Cir., 251 F.2d 18…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McFall
See also Standard Oil Co. of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 222 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation
Compare Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (requiring an established procedure "for the systematic or routine and timely making and preserving of company records") with United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 846 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (informal, regularly kept notes admissible).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
Compare Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 215 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958) (requiring an established procedure “for the systematic or routine and timely making and preserving of company records”) with United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815, 846 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 1058 , 92 S.Ct. 736 , 30 L.Ed.2d 745 (1972) (informal, regularly kept notes admissible).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
See, e. g., Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1957), cert, denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
IDEAL PLUMBING COMPANY v. Benco, Inc.
See, e. g., Standard Oil v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 198 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).” The court then stated: “We find, however, that Sunset has not proved, by sufficient evidence that Chrysler’s conduct was culpable. . . ” Emphasis added.) When we examine the evidence, the briefs, oral arguments, and the transcript of the trial, even in the light of the cited cases, we have concluded that the evidence on the issues is wholly insufficient to sustain the judgment.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John M. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Sunset Dodge v. Chrysler Corp.
See, e. g., Standard Oil v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 198 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958). 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baumler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
See, e. g., Standard Oil v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 198 (9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Francisco S.A. Ignacio and Antonio S.A. Ignacio v. People of the Territory of Guam
See also, Standard Oil Company of California v. Moore, 9th Cir. 1957, 251 F.2d 188, 221 , cert. denied 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jacques L. Leroy, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Paul Leroy, Deceased, and as Next Friend of Michael P. Leroy, Christine M. Leroy and Miren B. Leroy, Plaintiff-Appellee-Appellant v. Sabena Belgian World Airlines (Societe Anonyme Belge D'Exploitation De Lanavigation Aerienne), Defendant-Appellant-Appellee
See, e.g., Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 212 (9 Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958); United States v. Grayson, 166 F.2d 863, 869 (2 Cir. 1948) (L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LeRoy ex rel. LeRoy v. Sabena Belgian World Airlines
See, e. g., Standard Oil Co. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188, 212 (9 Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 975 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1148 (1958); United States v. Grayson, 166 F.2d 863, 869 (2 Cir. 1948) (L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Norma Wisnick v. United States
Compare Cash v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 265 , 261 F.2d 731 , judgment vacated and remanded for consideration in light of Ellis v. United States, supra, and Hill v. United States, 356 U.S. 704 , 78 S.Ct. 1139 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1145 (1958), 357 U.S. 219 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sealy
v.
Department of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania
v.
Department of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania
No. 976.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1958.
Frank D. Reeves and Robert A. Wright for petitioners., Thomas D. McBride, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Lois G. Forer, Deputy Attorney General, for the Department of Public Instruction of Pennsylvania et al., Geo. F. Baer Appel for the State Public School Building Authority, and Edward H. P. Fronefield and Howard M. Lutz for the School District of the Township of Darby et al., respondents.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir.
Certiorari denied.