green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.2 score
“the right to appear pro se exists to affirm the dignity and autonomy of the accused and to allow the presentation of what may, at least occasionally, be the accused's best possible defense.”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Lacey
the right to appear pro se exists to affirm the dignity and autonomy of the accused and to allow the presentation of what may, at least occasionally, be the accused's best possible defense.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Ass'n v. Sports Team Analysis & Tracking Systems, Inc.
(2×)
Although “[t]he printing of a book [is] the traditional focus of copyright protection,” Cable News Network, 940 F.2d at 1478 ; accord Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 430 , 104 S.Ct. 774, 782-83 , 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (“Indeed, it was the invention of a new form of copying equipment — the printing press — that gave rise to the original need for copyright protection.”), reh’g denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984), the Copyright Act reflects the history of “gradual expansion in the types of works accorded protection,” H.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
National Basketball Ass'n v. Sports Team Analysis & Tracking Systems, Inc.
(2×)
Although “[t]he printing of a book [is] the traditional focus of copyright protection,” Cable News Network, 940 F.2d at 1478 ; accord Sony Corp. of Am. v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417, 430 , 104 S.Ct. 774, 783 , 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (“Indeed, it was the invention of a new form of copying equipment — the printing press — that gave rise to the original need for copyright protection.”), reh’g denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984), the Copyright Act reflects the history of “gradual expansion in the types of works accorded protection,” H.Rep.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banks v. Horn
See, e.g., McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (1984), reh'g denied, 465 U.S. 1112 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banks v. Horn
See, e.g., McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 , 104 S.Ct. 944 , 79 L.Ed.2d 122 (1984), reh’g denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1620 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Religious Technology Center v. F.A.C.T.NET, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417 , 104 S.Ct. 774 , 78 L.Ed.2d 574 , reh’g denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984); Rotbart v. O’Dwyer Co., 34 U.S.P.Q.2d 1085 (S.D.N.Y.1995). *1526 Defendants maintain and the evidence does not refute that the Lerma postings to the Internet were made in the context of ongoing dialogue in the particular newsgroup to which they were posted.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conopco, Inc. v. May Dept. Stores Co.
(2×)
See also Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 , 439 n. 19, 104 S.Ct. 774 , 787 n. 19, 78 L.Ed.2d 574 reh'g denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984); Sealy, Inc. v. Easy Living, Inc., 743 F.2d 1378, 1381-82 (9th Cir.1984) (wholesalers which sold unmarked non-Sealy mattress foundations with knowledge that dealers would sell the merchandise as Sealy foundations liable as contributory infringers). 106.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Xerox Corp. v. Apple Computer, Inc.
(2×)
Compare, e.g., Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417, at 429 , 104 S.Ct. 774, at 782 , 78 L.Ed.2d 574 , rehearing denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984) with Universal City Studios v. Sony Corp., 659 F.2d 963 , at 965 (9th Cir.1981), rev'd, 464 U.S. 417 , 104 S.Ct. 774 , 78 L.Ed.2d 574 (1984). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Stenz
(2×)
See also Bowles v. State, 168 Ga.App. 763 , 310 S.E.2d 250 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984) (statute provided for allocution in felony cases); State v. Hanson, 304 Minn. 415 , 231 N.W.2d 104 (1975) (defendant was entitled to allocution based on a municipal court rule according defendants this right in misdemeanor cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. Rowland
(2×)
See, e.g., Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., 464 U.S. 417 , 104 S.Ct. 774 , 78 L.Ed.2d 574 , rehearing denied 465 U.S. 1112 , 104 S.Ct. 1619 , 80 L.Ed.2d 148 (1984) (sale of video recorders for use in homes not a contributory infringement of television program copyrights); Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 , 100 S.Ct. 2204 , 65 L.Ed.2d 144 (1980) (genetically engineered microorganism patentable "process” under 35 U.S.C. § 101 ); Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 , 93 S.Ct. 253 , 34 L.Ed.2d 273 (1972) (method for programming ordinary digital computer to convert …
Bowles
v.
Georgia
v.
Georgia
No. 83-6129 (A-708).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 1984.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Oregon Supreme Court (1)
Ct. App. Ga. Application for bail, presented to Justice Brennan, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.