PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express, 371 U.S. 184 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
PENSICK & GORDON, INC. v. California Motor Express, 371 U.S. 184 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: City of Bridgeport v. C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC (connsuperct, 2007-06-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
cited Cited "see" City of Bridgeport v. C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Stonybrook, Inc., 149 Conn. 492 , 181 A.2d 601 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 185 , 83 S. Ct. 265 , 9 L.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Danna v. Air France (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1971 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Pensick & Gordon, Inc. v. California Motor Express, 371 U.S. 184 , 83 S.Ct. 264 , 9 L.Ed.2d 227 (1962). 40 .
PENSICK & GORDON, INC.,
v.
CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS Et Al.
222.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1962.
371 U.S. 184
Carl M. Gould for petitioner., Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.
Harlan, Stewart, Hewitt-Robins.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.