green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Thurston v. United States
See generally Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines Inc., 373 F.2d 227 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 295 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 (1967). 21.
cited
Cited "see"
Tomoegawa USA, Inc. v. United States
See Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United States, 54 CCPA 138, 140-41, C.A.D. 925, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 294 , 19 L.Ed.2d 283 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diaz Castro v. United States
See, Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 373 F.2d 227 (2nd Cir., 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 295 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 ; United Air Lines v. Weiner, 335 F.2d 379 (9th Cir., 1963); Sullivan v. United States, 299 F.Supp. 621 (N.D. *962 Ala., 1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raese v. H. Brent Kelly
See Preston Corp. v. Raese, 236 F.Supp. 135 (N.D.W.Va.1964), aff’d, 377 F.2d 263 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 294 , 19 L.Ed.2d 283 (1967); see also Preston Corp. v. Raese, 335 F.2d 827 (4th Cir. 1964). .Elko Corporation, not previously mentioned by name in this memorandum, is one of the Kelly-owned companies which allegedly received moneys from Public Service without rendering any substantial services. .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alfredo Yruegas Valdez
See Granza v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 746 , cert. denied, 389 U. S. 939 , 88 S.Ct. 291 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyler v. Parks
See, United States v. Marchese, 341 F.2d 782 (9th Cir. 1965) cert. denied 389 U.S. 930 , 88 S.Ct. 294 , 19 L.Ed.2d 283 , reh. denied 389 U.S. 1025 , 88 S.Ct. 585 , 19 L.Ed.2d 674 ; Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 785 , 17 L.Ed.2d 690 (1967); Walker v. Bishop, 295 F.Supp. 767 (D.C.Ark.1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith Petroleum Service, Inc. v. Monsanto Chemical Company, Monsanto Chemical Company v. Smith Petroleum Service, Inc.
See Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 2 Cir. 1967, 373 F.2d 227 , 240 n. 12, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 295 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 ; Prosser, The Law of Torts § 48, at 278-79 (3d ed. 1964) ; 41 Am.Jur.2d, Indemnity § 3 (1968) ; 18 C.J.S., Contribution § 1 (1939). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dickens v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., American President Lines, Ltd. v. Welch, 377 F.2d 501 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 940 , 88 S.Ct. 294 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 (1967); American President Lines, Ltd. v. Redfem, 345 F.2d 629 (9th Cir.1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Industria Panificadora, S.A. v. United States
Compare, e.g., Monarch Insurance Co. v. District of Columbia, 353 F.Supp. 1249, 1258-1259 (D.D.C.1973) (planning and implementation of a riot control program for use during civil orders is a discretionary function), aff’d, 497 F.2d 684 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1021 , 95 S.Ct. 497 , 42 L.Ed.2d 295 (1974), with Downs v. United States, 522 F.2d 990 (6th Cir.1975) (FBI agent’s decision on how to handle an airplane hijacking not a protected act of discretion), and Miller v. United States, 410 F.Supp. 425 (E.D.Mich.1976) (negligent operation of waterworks protected by discretionary function exce…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Permagrain Products, Inc. v. United States
See, e.g., Rifkin Textiles Corp. v. United States, 54 CCPA 138, 141, C.A.D. 925, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 294 , 19 L.Ed.2d 283 (1967); see Izod Outerwear v. United States, 9 CIT—, Slip Op. 85-72, at 5 n. 4 (July 23, 1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Betty Garbarino, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward J. Garbarino, Deceased, and Individually v. United States
See, e.g., Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 373 F.2d 227 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 295 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy International Airport on June 24, 1975
(2×)
See, e. g., Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 373 F.2d 227, 236-37 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 931 , 88 S.Ct. 295 , 19 L.Ed.2d 292 (1968) (Government's negligent failure to provide up-to-date weather information to crew of plane attempting landing approach held to be proximate and concurrent cause of resulting accident). 67 Turning now to the issue of the trial court's exclusion of the so-called stipulated material facts, Eastern's argument at first blush appears to be as follows: that a certain bundle of facts existed in this case, which were agreed to by plaintiffs and Eastern, b…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Welch
v.
American President Lines, Ltd.
v.
American President Lines, Ltd.
No. 532.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1967.
Martin J. Jarvis for petitioner., Graydon S. Staring for respondent., Paul S. Edelman for American Trial Lawyers Association, Admiralty Section, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Association, Admiralty Section, for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.