green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V Montmartre
(2×)
But cf. Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 184 , 1982 A.M.C. 2752, 2767 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 , 1982.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Church of Scientology of Boston, Inc.
(2×)
the examination of books of account must be limited to that which is necessary to determine the amount of the tax imposed
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clinical Leasing Service, Inc., Melvin Soll and Leroy T. Brinkley
(2×)
See Baker v. Raymond Int'l, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 180 (5th Cir.1981) (holding that it is reversible error for a district court to fail to “present adequately and in context the factors that might warrant the imposition of [alter ego] liability”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 5.Ct. 2256, 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corporation
(2×)
See Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 664 F.2d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.1981) (suggesting that we engage in a more careful scrutiny of factual findings not prepared by the district court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vision Sports, Inc. v. Melville Corp.
(2×)
See Purex Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 664 F.2d 1105, 1108 (9th Cir.1981) (suggesting that we engage in a more careful scrutiny of factual findings not prepared by the district court), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kendrick v. Bowen
(2×)
See United States v. Dykema, 666 F.2d 1096, 1104 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2257 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982) (judicial notice taken of religious beliefs); United States v. Kahane, 396 F.Supp. 687, 692 (E.D.N.Y.), af f'd and modified on other grounds, 527 F.2d 492 (2d Cir.1985) (same); see also Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, at 22.
discussed
Cited "see"
David Nicol v. Gulf Fleet Supply Vessels, Inc., in Personam
(2×)
See generally Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173 (5th *297 Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
David Yashon, M.D. v. Ian W. Gregory, M.D.
(2×)
See Purex Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 664 F.2d 1105 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Otero v. Mesa County Valley School District No. 51, 628 F.2d 1271 (10th Cir.1980); Blizard v. Frechette, 601 F.2d 1217 (1st Cir.1979); Hennessy v. Schmidt, 583 F.2d 302 (7th Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorfman
See Sacramento Bee v. United States District Court, 656 F.2d 477 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, —- U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2257 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Belo Broadcasting Corp. v. Clark, 654 F.2d 423 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.
(2×)
See also Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) ("[t]he principal of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law.”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Krivo Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Thomas Solvent Co.
(2×)
See also Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) ("[t]he principal of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law."), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Krivo Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley Ex Rel. Michigan Natural Resources Commission v. Arco Industries Corp.
(2×)
See also Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) ("[t]he principal of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law.”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); Krivo Indus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joslyn Corporation v. TL James & Co., Inc.
(2×)
See also, Baker v. Raymond International, Inc., 656 F.2d 173, 179 (5th Cir.1981) (“[t]he principle of limited liability remains a dominant characteristic of American corporate law.”), cer t. denied, 456 U.S. 983 , 102 S.Ct. 2256 , 72 L.Ed.2d 861 (1982); and Krivo Industrial Supply Company v. National Distillers and Chemical Corp., 483 F.2d 1098, 1102 (5th Cir.1973) (“the corporate form ... is not lightly disregarded since limited liability is one of the principal purposes for which the law has created the corporation.”).
Rhodes
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-6589.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.