green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“we see no reason why a state executive branch, when operating within its constitutional and statutory authority, should be deemed any less sovereign than a state legislature, or less entitled to deference under principles of federalism.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Active Glass Corp. v. Architectural & Ornamental Iron Workers Local Union 580
But see Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co., 739 F.2d 464, 465 (9th Cir.1984) (excuse for illness where ill attorney is only attorney responsible for case), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1755 , 84 L.Ed.2d 819 (1985).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
REX - Real Estate Exchange, Inc. v. Brown
we see no reason why a state executive branch, when operating within its constitutional and statutory authority, should be deemed any less sovereign than a state legislature, or less entitled to deference under principles of federalism.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bass v. Coltelli-Rose
(2×)
See In re Teichner, 104 Ill.2d 150, 160 , 83 Ill.Dec. 552, 557 , 470 N.E.2d 972, 977 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1757 , 84 L.Ed.2d 820 (1985); F. MacKinnon, Contingent Fees for Legal Services 44-45 (1964). [3] Tatterson, 177 W.Va. at 362-63 , 352 S.E.2d at 113-14 (footnote omitted and footnote added).
cited
Cited "see"
Mary Dickerson v. Board of Education of Ford Heights, Illinois
See Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co., 739 F.2d 464, 465 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1755 , 84 L.Ed.2d 819 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alicia Nieto Jacobs v. Maricopa County
See Williams v. City of Montgomery, 742 F.2d 586, 589 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 (1985) (holding that a City-County Personnel Board was the "agent" of the employer/city for Title VII purposes because the city had delegated to the personnel board certain "traditional" employer rights, such as formulating pay and classification plans; evaluating employees; and promoting, demoting, transferring and reinstating employees).
cited
Cited "see"
Dority v. State
See Moore v. State, 457 So.2d 981 (Ala.Crim.App.1984), cer t. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1757 , 84 L.Ed.2d 820 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Dority v. State
See Moore v. State , 457 So.2d 981 (Ala.Crim.App. 1984), cert. denied , 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1757 , 84 L.Ed.2d 820 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. Tatterson
See In re Teichner, 104 Ill.2d 150, 160 , 83 Ill.Dec. 552, 557 , 470 N.E.2d 972, 977 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1757 , 84 L.Ed.2d 820 (1985); F. MacKinnon, Contingent Fees for Legal Services 44-45 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Data Race, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
See also Nestier Corp. v. Menasha Corp. -Lewisystems Div., 739 F.2d 1576, 1580-81 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1756 , 84 L.Ed.2d 819 (1985) (district court did not abuse discretion in withholding judgment of invalidity despite jury's finding that the patent was "not invalid” when non-infringement is clear and invalidity is not "plainly evident”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deuterium Corp. v. United States
Compare Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 833 F.2d 931, 934 (Fed.Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1226 , 99 L.Ed.2d 426 (1988), with Nestier Corp. v. Menasha Corp., 739 F.2d 1576 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1756 , 84 L.Ed.2d 819 (1985). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. State
See also Moore v. State , 457 So.2d 981 , 989 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1757 , 84 L.Ed.2d 820 (1985); Williams v. State , 451 So.2d 411 , 418 (Ala.Cr.App. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elmer Gerard Pratt v. D.J. McCarthy Superintendent
The standard only allows an extension of time in “ ‘extraordinary cases where injustice would otherwise result.’ ” Alaska Limestone, 799 F.2d at 1411 , quoting Champion International, 680 F.2d at 1301 ; see also Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co., 739 F.2d 464, 465 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam) (Islamic Republic) (“Since the appellant here received notice of entry of judgment, the district court’s finding of excusable neglect is sustainable only if there were extraordinary circumstances that prevented a timely filing and denying the appeal would result in injustice.”), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. State
(2×)
Texas v. Brown, 460 U.S. 730 , 103 S.Ct. 1535 , 75 L.Ed.2d 502 (1983); Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796 , 104 S.Ct. 3380 , 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984); see also Moore v. State, 457 So.2d 981 Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 457 So.2d 981 (Ala.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1757 , 84 L.Ed.2d 820 (1985), and authorities therein cited.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LeMaster v. City of Winnemucca
See, e.g., Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co., 739 F.2d 464, 465 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1053 , 105 S.Ct. 1755 , 84 L.Ed.2d 819 (1985) (under “excusable neglect” standard of Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5), the illness of counsel “may amount to extraordinary circumstances when the illness is so physically and mentally disabling that counsel is unable to file the appeal and is not reasonably capable of communicating to co-counsel his inability to file.”); Board of Education v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 48 F.R.D. 402 (S.D.N.Y.1969). (counsel’s severe injuries left him fully …
Gress
v.
Michigan
v.
Michigan
No. 84-1172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1985.
Ct. App. Mich. Certio-rari denied.