Alvord v. United States, 99 U.S. 593 (1879). · Go Syfert
Search
Alvord v. United States, 99 U.S. 593 (1879). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
127 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 56 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hall v. United States (vaed, 1998-12-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1902 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1902 1964 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Hall v. United States
E.D. Va. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Whiskey Cases, 99 U.S. 594 , 9 Otto 594 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878)(finding that an accomplice who acts in good faith and testifies fully and fairly as to his own acts and those of others is equitably entitled to a pardon and the prosecutor should join in such a recommendation).
cited Cited "see" Finch v. Vaughn
11th Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594, 606 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sanderson
M.D. Fla. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whiskey Cases, 99 U.S. 594, 598-606 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Russell Weiss (2×)
5th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See The Whiskey Cases, 99 U.S. 594, 598-606 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878).
discussed Cited "see" Governmental Ethics Commission v. Cahill
Kan. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878); Com. v. Strickler, 481 Pa. 579, 584 , 393 A.2d 313 (1978); In re Daley, 549 F.2d 469 , 480 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 434 U.S. 829 (1977); United States v. Gorham, 523 F.2d 1088, 1096 (D.C.
cited Cited "see" Hammers v. State
Ark. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See (Whiskey Cases) United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594 , 25 L.
cited Cited "see" Earl Hunter v. United States
9th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Whiskey Cases, 99 U.S. 594 , 25 L.Ed. 399 .
cited Cited "see" Venson Eugene Williams v. A. L. Dutton, Warden of the State Prison at Reidsville, Georgia
5th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594, 595 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878) (dictum). 27 .
cited Cited "see" Lee v. State
unknown court · 1934 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whiskey cases, United States v. Ford, et al., 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Jones
C.A.A.F. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Munn v. McKelvey, 733 S.W.2d 765, 770 (Mo.1987); see also United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594, 603 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Clark
S.D. Ohio · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594, 604 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878) (The Whiskey cases) (holding that a public prosecutor is permitted to induce a witness to fully and fairly testify to the guilt of his associates in exchange for the prosecutor’s recommendation for executive clemency).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Guillaume
S.D. Fla. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594, 604 , 9 Otto 594 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878) (holding that a public prosecutor is permitted to induce a witness to fully and fairly testify the guilt of his associates in exchange for the prosecutor’s recommendation for executive clemency).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Guiuan (2×)
Cal. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
L.Rev. 1, 7, fns. omitted (Hughes); see also Whiskey Cases (1878) 99 U.S. 594, 599 [ 25 L.Ed. 399 , 401]; Zimmerman, Toward a New Vision of Informants: A History of Abuses and Suggestions for Reform (1994) 22 Hastings Const.L.Q. 81, 152-156; Note, Let’s Make a Deal: A Look at United States v. Dailey and Prosecutor-Witness Cooperation Agreements (1987) 67 B.U.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commonwealth v. Strickler (2×)
Pa. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878) (holding that such testimony may not be pleaded in bar of, or raised as a defense in, a subsequent prosecution but creates only an equitable right to an executive pardon which the court will take note of by staying the prosecution to permit an application to the pardoning power), with Commonwealth v. Bell, 145 Pa. 374, 391 , 22 A. 641, 644 (1891) (dictum that where a court erroneously holds that immunity applies and orders a witness to testify, "[n]o court would permit the testimony of a witness, truthfully given under such circu…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Franklin v. State
Nev. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See People v. Green, 102 Cal. App.2d 831 , 228 P.2d 867 (1951); Harris v. State, 15 Tex.Cr.App. 629 (1884); Rex v. Robinson, 70 D.L.R. 755, 30 B.C. 369 (1921); see also United States v. Ford, 99 U.S. 594 , 25 L.Ed. 399 (1878); cf. State v. Quinn, 142 S.W.2d 79 (Mo. 1940).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Bryan v. State
Okla. Crim. App. · 1914 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, United States v. Pord, 99 U. S. 594 , 25 L.
Alvord
v.
United States
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1879.
99 U.S. 593
Mr. J, W. Denver in support of the motion.
Waite.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Mr. Chief Justice Waite

announced the judgment of the court.

This application comes directly within the rule laid down in Hurley v. Jones, 97 U. S. 318. As we took occasion to say in that case, “ our rules requiring causes to be ready for hearing when reached are and will continue to be rigidly enforced.” We recognize no pro forma attorneys of record. Counsel who enter their appearance under the requirements of Rule 9 must understand that the court will hold them responsible for all that such an entry implies until they relieve themselves from the obligation they assume, by substitution or otherwise.

Motion denied.