Howard Hall Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 818 (1946). · Go Syfert
Search
Howard Hall Co. v. United States, 328 U.S. 818 (1946). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Dumont (me, 1986-03-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1946 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1946 1986 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Dumont (2×)
Me. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ex parte Gosselin, 141 Me. 412 , 44 A.2d 882 (1946), appeal dismissed, 328 U.S. 817 , 66 S.Ct. 982 , 90 L.Ed. 1599 (whether indictment, as distinguished from complaint, is requisite to commencement of prosecution, depends on whether offense is punishable for period of one year). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reed Research, Inc. v. Schumer Company, Inc. (Schock, Gusmer & Co., Inc.)
D.C. Cir. · 1957 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also 6 Moore's Federal Practice § 56.15(2) (2d ed. 1953) 1 De Pasquale v. Williams-Bauer Corporation, 151 F.2d 578 (2d Cir.1945), certiorari denied 328 U.S. 836 , 66 S.Ct. 1007 , 90 L.Ed. 1612 (1946) 2 Peebles v. Yates, 88 Miss. 289 , 40 So. 996 (1906); Jorgensen v. Kingsley, 60 Neb. 44 , 82 N.W. 104 (1900) 3 Annotation, 104 A.L.R. 245 , 251 (1936) 4 This letter apparently followed a meeting of the parties; the record is ambiguous on this point 5 As in the case of Riley v. Mattingly, 42 App.D.C. 290 (D.C.Cir.1914), where Riley held an account received for eight months without objection.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Howard Hall Co., Inc.
v.
United States
No. 627.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 6, 1946.
328 U.S. 818
Harold G. Hernly argued the cause for appellant., With him on the brief was James W. Wrape. Daniel W. Knowlton argued the cause for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees., With him on the brief were Solicitor General McGrath, Assistant Attorney General Berge, Edward Dumbauld, David O. Mathews, Nelson Thomas and Allen Crenshaw.
Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed. Alton R. Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 15; United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475; Howard Hall Co. v. United States, 315 U. S. 495.