green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service Commission
Supp. 27, 32, affirmed in 338 U. S. 803 , 70 Sup. Ct. 64, 94 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Battle v. Liberty National Life Insurance
See Partmar Corp. v. United States, 338 U.S. 804 , 70 S.Ct. 69 , 94 L.Ed. 486 (1949); Allen Calculators Inc. v. National Cash Register Co., 322 U.S. 137 , 64 S.Ct. 905 , 88 L.Ed. 1188 (1944).
discussed
Cited "see"
Battle v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company
See Partmar Corp. v. United States, 338 U.S. 804 , 70 S.Ct. 69 , 94 L.Ed. 486 (1949); Allen Calculators Inc. v. National Cash Register Co., 322 U.S. 137 , 64 S.Ct. 905 , 88 L.Ed. 1188 (1944). 40 Even though the allegations in the complaint in the case at hand may be similar to those in the 1954 case, this alone does not automatically preclude this cause of action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beeman
v.
Michigan Board of Pharmacy
v.
Michigan Board of Pharmacy
No. 134.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1949.
Raymond K. Dykema for appellants. Stephen J. Roth, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, Ernest O. Zirkalos and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.