green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Seward Chapel, Inc. v. City of Seward
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see, e.g., Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville, 90 Cal.App.2d 656 , 203 P.2d 823 (1949), appeal dismissed, 338 U.S. 805 , 70 S.Ct. 78 , 94 L.Ed. 487 (1949); Miami Beach United Lutheran Church of the Epiphany v. City of Miami Beach, 82 So.2d 880 (Fla.1955) (en banc). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Messiah Baptist Church v. The County Of Jefferson
See Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. City of Porterville, 90 Cal.App.2d 656 , 203 P.2d 823 , appeal dismissed, 338 U.S. 805 , 70 S.Ct. 78 , 94 L.Ed. 487 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
Messiah Baptist Church v. County of Jefferson
See Corporation of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. City of Porterville, 90 Cal.App.2d 656 , 203 P.2d 823 , appeal dismissed, 338 U.S. 805 , 70 S.Ct. 78 , 94 L.Ed. 487 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cameron
See Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville, 90 Cal. App. 2d 656 , 203 P. 2d 823 (D.Ct.App. 1949), app. dism. for want of a substantial federal question, 338 U.S. 805 , 70 S.Ct. 78 , 94 L.Ed. 487 (1949).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Colorado Springs v. Blanche
See, e.g., Corporation of Presiding Bishop v. City of Porterville, 90 Cal.App.2d 656, 203 P.2d 823 (1949) (zoning ordinance excluding churches from residential districts valid), appeal dismissed, 338 U.S. 805 , 70 S.Ct. 78 , 94 L.Ed. 487 (1949); Allendale Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Grosman, 30 N.J. 273 , 152 A.2d 569 (1959) (per curiam) (denial of permit to build church did not violate first amendment where church could comply with regulations governing parking), appeal dismissed, 361 U.S. 536 , 80 S.Ct. 587 , 4 L.Ed.2d 538 (1960); Damascus Community Church v. Clackamas County, 4…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Engineering Corp.
v.
Texas Employment Commission (formerly known as Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission)
v.
Texas Employment Commission (formerly known as Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission)
No. 196.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1949.
A. C. Heath for appellants. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, for appellees.
Published
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.