Roberts v. United States, 342 U.S. 885 (1951). · Go Syfert
Search
Roberts v. United States, 342 U.S. 885 (1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“... it would be contrary to the interests of society that funds dedicated to a charitable use be permitted to be diverted or diminished by the payment of judgments ... where suit is instituted by the beneficiary of the charity”
68 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Loder v. St. Thomas Greek Orthodox Church (njsuperctappdiv, 1996-11-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Loder v. St. Thomas Greek Orthodox Church
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
harities do not lose their immunities by virtue of the fact that certain fees are charged for their charitable services ....
examined Cited as authority (quoted) DeVries v. Habitat for Humanity
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1996 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
... it would be contrary to the interests of society that funds dedicated to a charitable use be permitted to be diverted or diminished by the payment of judgments ... where suit is instituted by the beneficiary of the charity
discussed Cited "see" National Labor Relations Board v. Union Carbide Corporation (2×)
4th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Labor Relations Board v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 189 F.2d 124 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U. S. 885 , 72 S.Ct. 173 , 96 L.Ed. 663 .
Roberts
v.
United States
No. 351.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1951.
342 U.S. 885
Joseph J. Lyman and Josiah Lyman for petitioners., Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Edward S. Szukelewicz for the United States.
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (2)

United States Court of Appeals for thé District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.