green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1985 ·
…ne of the purposes for conferring upon the trustee in reorganization broad investigatory powers" is "the exposure of corporate abuses_
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weissman v. Hassett
(2×)
ne of the purposes for conferring upon the trustee in reorganization broad investigatory powers" is "the exposure of corporate abuses_
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McDonnell v. American Leduc Petroleums, Ltd.
Applying New York law, see Austrian v. Williams, 198 F.2d 097 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ot. 328, 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952), the district court held that in this case Xew York courts would follow X.Y.C.P.L.R. § 202 (McKinney 1963), the Xew York “borrowing statute,” and apply the, California two-year limitations period applicable to actions brought on behalf of a corporation against officers, directors or stockholders for waste or injury to property.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eisenberg v. Feiner (In Re Ahead by a Length, Inc.)
(2×)
See Austrian v. Williams, 198 F.2d 697 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952); Dabney v. Levy, 191 F.2d 201, 204-05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 342 U.S. 887 , 72 S.Ct. 177 , 96 L.Ed. 665 (1951); accord Hooper v. Mountain States Securities Corp., 282 F.2d 195, 205-06 (5th Cir.1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 814 , 81 S.Ct. 695 , 5 L.Ed.2d 693 (1961); contra Wells v. Place, 92 F.Supp. 477 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
McNellis v. Raymond
See Austrian v. Williams, 198 F.2d 697, 701 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 909 (1952): “[Section 11(e)] expressly precludes the trustee in bankruptcy . . from bringing suit upon ‘any claim against ■which the period of limitations fixed by . . .
examined
Cited "see"
Lillian N. Burg v. Max Horn and George Horn, and Darand Realty Corp.
(4×)
Accord, Austrian v. Williams, 103 F.Supp. 64, 76-80 (S.D.N.Y.), rev'd on other grounds, 198 F.2d 697 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Lowell Wiper Supply Co. v. Helen Shop, Inc.
See Austrian v. Williams, 198 F.2d 697, 700 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 244 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Austrian v. Williams
(2×)
See Austrian v. Williams, 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 697 , certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Austrian v. Williams
(2×)
See Austrian v. Williams, 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 697 , certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 . 3 Following the successful result of the Trustees' action as to them, the seven defendants who are parties to these appeals brought on applications before Judge Weinfeld for allowances of expenses and attorneys' fees in that action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Austrian, Trustees
v.
Williams
v.
Williams
No. 431.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 22, 1952.
Carl J. Austrian, Saul J. Lance and Isadore H. Cohen for petitioners., Arthur H. Dean and Milton Pollack for Williams, respondent., Acting Solicitor General Stern and Roger S. Foster filed a memorandum for the Securities & Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.