green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
13.1 score
“chasing and bumping into official”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Francis E. Wollenzien
chasing and bumping into official
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dubroc
See Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988) ; State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dubroc
See Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988) ; State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dubroc
See Holloway v. Lynaugh , 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988) ; State v. Firmin , 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Dubroc
See Holloway v. Lynaugh , 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988) ; State v. Firmin , 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Boutte
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gobert
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), [cert. denied ], 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), [writ denied ], 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Samuel
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), [ cert. denied ], 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tyrone
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La. 1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fletcher
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App.4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Novak
Nonetheless, we agree with the District Court that Novak’s misconduct occurred while a judicial proceeding was “pending” because the relevant conduct “occurred prior to sentencing and within the time after sentencing for filing a request for reduction of sentence pursuant to Rule 35(b).” 13 Report and Recommendation at 9; see United States v. Fernandez, 837 F.2d 1031, 1034 (11th Cir.) (holding that, even if § 1503 requires “a pending judicial proceeding,” such requirement was met where misconduct occurred after sentencing but within period to file motion to reduce sentence pursu…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Payne
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
See, Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988); State v. Firmin, 522 So.2d 1181 (La.App. 4th Cir.), writ denied, 532 So.2d 759 (La.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steve v. Arbizo
See United States v. Alvarado, 838 F.2d 311, 317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1222 (1988), and cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 (1988) (even if instruction found to be erroneous, application of harmless error doctrine is appropriate where evidence is "so overwhelming that a conviction is compelled").
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald Alexander v. John P. Whitley, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana
See Holloway v. Lynaugh, 838 F.2d 792, 793 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 104 , 102 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry K. Hiland, United States of America v. Carter-Glogau Laboratories, Inc., Now Known as Retrac, Inc., United States of America v. Ronald M. Carter, Sr.
See United States v. Alvarado, 838 F.2d 311, 314 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1222 , 108 S.Ct. 2880 , 101 L.Ed.2d 915 , 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 103 , 102 L.Ed.2d 778 (1988); United States v. Manriquez Arbizo, 833 F.2d 244, 248-49 (10th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hiland
See United States v. Alvarado, 838 F.2d 311, 314 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1222 , 108 S.Ct. 2880 , 101 L.Ed.2d 915 , 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 103 , 102 L.Ed.2d 778 (1988); United States v. Manriquez Arbizo, 833 F.2d 244, 248-49 (10th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald FULBRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant
The court in Knife explained that “a federal court officer in Ms daily work would always be assumed to be in the discharge of his federal duty_” Knife, 371 F.Supp. at 1348 ; see also United States v. Fernandez, 837 F.2d 1031 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 102 , 102 L.Ed.2d 78 (1988) (dicta rejecting, defendant’s contention that prosecution, to prove endeavor to intimidate official in “discharge of Ms dut[ies],” must establish that official was performing those duties in the context of a pending judicial proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Aguilar
United States v. Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d 1070, 1075 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Alvarado, 838 F.2d 311, 317 (9th Cir.) (“Application of the harmless error doctrine is appropriate where the evidence of guilt is so overwhelming that a conviction is compelled.”), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1222 , 108 S.Ct. 2880 , 101 L.Ed.2d 915 and 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 103 , 102 L.Ed.2d 78 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert P. Aguilar, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Robert P. Aguilar, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
United States v. Sanchez-Robles, 927 F.2d 1070, 1075 (9th Cir.1991); see also United States v. Alvarado, 838 F.2d 311, 317 (9th Cir.) ("Application of the harmless error doctrine is appropriate where the evidence of guilt is so overwhelming that a conviction is compelled."), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1222 , 108 S.Ct. 2880 , 101 L.Ed.2d 915 and 488 U.S. 838 , 109 S.Ct. 103 , 102 L.Ed.2d 78 (1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holloway
v.
Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
No. 87-7160.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
488 U.S. 838
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.