green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Brewer v. Dana Corp. Spicer Heavy Axle Division
See generally Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th Cir.1988), cert denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hollar
See Rule 56(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2513-14 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986), Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989), Orsi v. Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mumford v. CSX Transportation
See Rule 56(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2513-14 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986), Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989), Orsi v. Kirkwood, 999 F.2d 86 (4th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gower v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Id. at 1014-15 (citing McCorstin v. United States Steel Corp., 621 F.2d 749, 753 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 627 F.2d 239 (1980)); see also Fink v. Western Electric Co., 708 F.2d 909 (4th Cir.1983); Williams v. General Motors Corp., 656 F.2d 120, 129-30 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 1439 , 71 L.Ed.2d 655 (1982); accord Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 320 (4th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989) (fourth element may be satisfied by showing “that persons outside the protected class were retained in the same position …
cited
Cited "see"
Nello L. Teer Co. v. Orange County
Fed.R.Civ.P. 50; see Herold v. HAJOCA Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Strickland v. MICA Information Systems
See Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th *1323 Cir.1988), cert. den. 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Frazzini
See Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 322-23 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Stahl v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.
See Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 322-23 (4th Cir.1988), cert den., 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Grooms v. Mobay Chemical Corp.
See Herold v. Hajorca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th Cir.1988), cert. den'd, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse T. Duke Sidney W. Fox v. Uniroyal Incorporated Uniroyal Chemical Company, Incorporated, and Norman R. Barden Joseph R. Bishop, (Two Cases) Sidney W. Fox, Jesse T. Duke v. Uniroyal Incorporated Uniroyal Chemical Company, Incorporated, and Norman R. Barden Joseph R. Bishop, Jesse T. Duke Sidney W. Fox v. Uniroyal Incorporated Uniroyal Chemical Company, Incorporated, and Norman R. Barden Joseph R. Bishop
See Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989); Gill v. Rollins Protective Services Co., 773 F.2d 592, 594 (4th Cir.1985). 9 In the context of the ADEA, a plaintiff must prove, with reasonable probability, that but for the age of the plaintiff, the employment decision adverse to the plaintiff would not have been made.
discussed
Cited "see"
Duke v. Uniroyal Inc.
See Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989); Gill v. Rollins Protective Services Co., 773 F.2d 592, 594 (4th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Mumtaz Bano Khan v. Jimmy R. Jenkins, John H. Carson, Elizabeth City State University, and Marion D. Thorpe
See Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 321 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John Hancock Mutual Life Ins. v. Amerford International Corp.
See id. at 322 , 106 S.Ct. at 2552 ; see also Greater Buffalo Press, Inc. v. Federal Reserve Bank, 866 F.2d 38 , 42 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1107 , 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eden v. Amoco Oil Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Herold v. Hajoca, 864 F.2d 317, 323-24 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 3159 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989); Gilliam v. Armtex, Inc., 820 F.2d 1387, 1389-90 (4th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conkwright v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Western Electric, 713 F.2d at 1014 (citations omitted); see also Herold v. Hajoca Corp., 864 F.2d 317, 319 (4th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 3159 , *1013 104 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1989); Fink v. Western Electric Co., 708 F.2d 909, 915 (4th Cir.1983); Lovelace, 681 F.2d at 240-41 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sterling Drug Inc.
v.
Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
v.
Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
No. 88-1691.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1989.
Published
Sup. Ct. Wis. Certiorari denied.