green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Research Corporation Technologies Incorporated v. Eli Lilly and Company
Because royalty payments are “unlawful per se” under Brulotte, and the 8 Agreement itself was set to expire on the same day the Patent Rights expired, RCT cannot 9 show it expected payment from Lilly beyond the expiration of the Patent Rights. 379 U.S. 10 at 32; see also Kimble, 727 F.3d at 857 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baltimore & OR Co. v. CMWLTH., D. OF L. & I.
Bargain City U.S.A. v. Dilworth, 407 Pa. 129, 131-33 , 179 A.2d 439, 441-42 (1962); compare Milk Control Commission v. Battista, 413 Pa. 652 , 198 A.2d 840 , appeal dismissed, 379 U.S. 3 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 22 (1964), with Williamson v. Lee Optical, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); see also Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan Agency, 460 Pa. 1, 13 , 331 A.2d 198, 204 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Commonwealth
Bargain City U.S.A. v. Dilworth, 407 Pa. 129, 131-33 , 179 A.2d 439, 441-42 (1962); compare Milk Control Commission v. Battista, 413 Pa. 652 , 198 A.2d 840 , appeal dismissed, 379 U.S. 3 , 85 S.Ct. 75 , 13 L.Ed.2d 22 (1964), with Williamson v. Lee Optical, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 , 75 S.Ct. 461 , 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955); see also Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan Agency, 460 Pa. 1, 13 , 331 A.2d 198, 204 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ford
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
329.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
Floyd J. Reed for appellant.
Per Curiam.
Published
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.