green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.1 score
“the board did not 'interfere with interests that were sufficiently bound up with the reasonable expectations of the claimant to constitute "property" for fifth amendment purposes”
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
National Education Ass'n v. Retirement Board of the Rhode Island Employees' Retirement System
the board did not 'interfere with interests that were sufficiently bound up with the reasonable expectations of the claimant to constitute "property" for fifth amendment purposes
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
NAT. EDUC. ASS'N-RHODE ISLAND v. Retirement Bd.
the board did not interfere with interests that were sufficiently bound up with the reasonable expectations of the claimant to constitute "property" for fifth amendment purposes
cited
Cited "see"
R.V.S., LLC v. City of Rockford
See Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Comm’rs of Jay County, Ind., 57 F.3d 505, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 672 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loges v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
Inv. v. Sterling Heights, 949 F.2d 890, 895-96 (6th Cir.1091); accord, Pro-Eco v. Bd. Of Comm’rs of Jay County, 57 F.3d 505, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. den. 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 672 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995), 4 Thus, Petitioner was not entitled to any notice regarding the constitutional amendment or the vote that approved it.
cited
Cited "see"
Thorn's Diesel Service, Inc. v. Houston Ship Repair, Inc.
See United States v. Turecamo of Savannah, Inc., 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 673 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Hannover Corp. of America v. Beckner
See Scholes v. Lehmann, 56 F.3d 750, 755 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 673 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995) (Posner, J.).
discussed
Cited "see"
37712, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control and Michael A. Akrouche
Inv. v. Sterling Heights, 949 F.2d 890, 895-96 (6th Cir.1991); accord, Pro-Eco v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Jay County, 57 F.3d 505, 513 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 672 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Strickland v. Shotts
See also Scholes v. Lehmann, 56 F.3d 750 (7th Cir.1995) cert. denied 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 673 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 and Rodriguez v. Schweiger, 796 F.2d 930 (7th Cir.1986) ce rt. denied 481 U.S. 1018 , 107 S.Ct. 1899 , 95 L.Ed.2d 506 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Superior-FCR Landfill, Inc. v. County of Wright
See, e.g., City of Shakopee v. Clark, 295 N.W.2d 495, 497-98 (Minn.1980) (recognizing that an optionor acquires an equitable interest in land “[o]nce a contract option has been exercised”); see also Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Comm’rs, 57 F.3d 505, 509 (7th Cir.) (holding, under Indiana law, that a plaintiff with the option to buy land had no property interest in the land for purposes of determining whether there had been a taking), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 672 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welt v. Sirmans
Waslow v. Thornton (In re Greenberg), 212 B.R. 76, 91 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1997) (citing F.D.I.C. v. O’Melveny & Myers, 61 F.3d 17, 19 (9th Cir.1995)); see also Scholes v. Lehmann, 56 F.3d 750, 754 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1028 , 116 S.Ct. 673 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995); Gordon v. Basroon (In re Plaza Mortgage and Fin.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waterview Management Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
See, e.g., Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Comm’rs of Jay County, IN, 57 F.3d 505, 509 (7th Cir.) (While California recognizes a compensable property right in unexercised options to purchase real estate, Indiana does not.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 672 , 133 L.Ed.2d 522 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Turecamo of Savannah, Inc.
v.
Turecamo of Savannah, Inc.
No. 95-525.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1995.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: D. Rhode Island (2)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.