Early v. United States, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996). · Go Syfert
Early v. United States, 518 U.S. 1007 (1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“ur best guess is that the supreme court would regard reversible per se if there were a timely objection-although not automatically "plain error' if no objection occurred....”
24 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. De Castro (ca11, 1997-04-30) · Strongest negative: United States v. Keith Dozier, Also Known as Pete, Also Known as Keith Bashir. Keith Dozier (ca3, 1997-07-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Keith Dozier, Also Known as Pete, Also Known as Keith Bashir. Keith Dozier
3rd Cir. · 1997 · signal: but see · confidence high
A, para. 3(b) (describing violation of supervised release as "breach of trust" in connection with original sentence); but see United States v. Reese, 71 F.3d 582, 587-90 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1996) (concluding that because defendants have notice of potential penalties for violations of supervised release at time they commit these violations, such penalties are for those violations and not for underlying criminal offense).
discussed Cited "but see" United States v. Dozier
3rd Cir. · 1997 · signal: but see · confidence high
A, para. 3(b) (describing violation of supervised release as “breach of trust” in connection with original sentence); but see United States v. Reese, 71 F.3d 582, 587-90 (6th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1996) (concluding that because defendants have notice of potential penalties for violations of supervised release at time they commit these violations, such penalties are for those violations and not for underlying criminal offense).
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. De Castro
11th Cir. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
ur best guess is that the supreme court would regard reversible per se if there were a timely objection-although not automatically "plain error' if no objection occurred....
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Paul W. Graffia and Lion Bernard
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vega, 72 F.3d 507, 516-517 (7th Cir.1995), certiorari denied sub nom., — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1053 ; United States v. Fauls, 65 F.3d 592, 598 (7th Cir.1995), certiorari denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1697 , 134 L.Ed.2d 796 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Honore Fred Farouil, Cross-Appellee (2×)
7th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Vega, 72 F.3d 507, 516-17 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2529 , 135 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Early
v.
United States
No. 95-8299.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1996.
518 U.S. 1007

C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.