Smith v. Off. of Civilian Health & Med. Prog. of the Uniformed Servs., 519 U.S. 1144 (1997). · Go Syfert
Smith v. Off. of Civilian Health & Med. Prog. of the Uniformed Servs., 519 U.S. 1144 (1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Healthcare America v. Bossemeyer (ca10, 1998-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Healthcare America v. Bossemeyer
10th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. CHAMPUS, 97 F.3d 950 , 956 (7th Cir.1996) (determining that where no criteria were given for determining whether a procedure meets the "generally accepted" standard, the meaning of the term was a matter for the insurer's interpretation, "subject to deferential court review"), cert. dismissed, 519 U.S. 1144 , 117 S.Ct. 1027 , 137 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997).
discussed Cited "see" Elsroth v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NY
S.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. CHAMPUS, 97 F.3d 950 , 951 (7th Cir.1996), cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1027 , 137 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997); Bailey v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Va., 67 F.3d 53, 55 (4th Cir.1995). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Illinois v. City of Chicago, Illinois, and City of Gary, Indiana (2×)
7th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Quinones v. Evanston, 58 F.3d 275 (7th Cir.1995), and Mueller v. Reich, 54 F.3d 438 (7th Cir.1995), vacated on unrelated grounds under the name Wisconsin v. Mueller, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1077 , 137 L.Ed.2d 212 (1997) (both cases holding that the right defendant is the person claiming a benefit under a law, rather than the author of a law or regulation).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Office of Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services
No. 96-7142.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1997.
519 U.S. 1144
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.