green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. MacKey
Ed. 2d 548 (1988); accord State v. Harden, 344 N.C. 542, 556 , 476 S.E.2d 658, 665 (1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1147 , 137 L.
examined
Cited "see"
Jerry Mahaffey v. Thomas Page, Warden
(3×)
See McCain v. Gramley, 96 F.3d 288, 292 (7th Cir.1996) (inference of discrimination may be drawn “where there are only a few members of a racial group on the venire panel and one party strikes each one of them”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1320 , 137 L.Ed.2d 482 (1997); United States v. Sowa, 34 F.3d 447, 452 (7th Cir.1994) (in challenge to use of peremptory challenges by defense counsel, court held that “[t]he government easily made its prima facie case that the peremptory challenges were motivated by race; each and every black venireperson [six in all] was challenged.”), cert.…
examined
Cited "see"
Jerry Mahaffey v. Thomas Page, Warden
(4×)
See McCain v. Gramley, 96 F.3d 288, 292 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1320 , 137 L.Ed.2d 482 (1997); United States v. Cooper, 19 F.3d 1154, 1160-61 (7th Cir.1994); see also Matthews v. Evatt, 105 F.3d 907, 918 (4th Cir.1997) (following the same approach), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 102 , 139 L.Ed.2d 57 (1997); Johnson v. Love, 40 F.3d 658, 663-64 (3d Cir.1994) (same); United States v. Johnson, 941 F.2d 1102, 1108 (10th Cir.1991) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Remeta v. State
See Remeta v. Singletary, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S.Ct. 1320 , 137 L.Ed.2d 482 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lloyd
Specifically, we have held that “ ‘[b]loody clothing of a victim that is corroborative of the State’s case, is illustrative of the testimony of a witness, or throws any light on the circumstances of the crime is relevant and admissible evidence at trial.’ ” State v. Gaines, 345 N.C. at 666 , 483 S.E.2d at 407 (quoting State v. Knight, 340 N.C. at 559 , 459 S.E.2d at 498 ) (no abuse of discretion in admitting bloody shirt, pants, belt, radio, radio holder, and handcuff case of victim where items helped jury to understand testimony of witnesses and showed matters that were corroborativ…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility
Nevertheless, the fact that the government tried to strike the only three blacks who were on the panel constitutes a sufficiently dramatic pattern of actions to make out a prima facie case. 3 See United States v. Alvarado, 923 F.2d 253, 255-56 (2d Cir.1991) (finding a prima facie case when the prosecution struck four out of seven minority jurors); see also McCain v. Gramley, 96 F.3d 288, 292 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 117 S.Ct. 1320 , 137 L.Ed.2d 482 (1997) (“[Wjhere there are only a few members of a racial group on the venire panel and one party strikes each one of them,…
Johnson
v.
Iowa
v.
Iowa
No. 96-7582.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 24, 1997.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.