discussed Cited "see" Microsoft Corporation v. Internal Revenue Service See 16 United States v. Chen, 99 F.3d 1495 (9th Cir. 1996) (rebuttable presumption that a lawyer is hired to give legal advice) cert. 17 denied, 520 U.S. 1167 (1998). 18 Dkt. #78 at 13–14 (emphasis in original). 19 While facts alone are not protected by this privilege, communications between an 20 attorney and a client are, even if those communications contain facts, if the purpose of the 21 22 communication is to enable the attorney to provide legal advice.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States Co. v. United States, 54 Fed.Cl. 306, 315 (2002) (emphasis removed) (quoting 8 Wigmore, Evidence § 2296); see also United States v. Chen, 99 F.3d 1495, 1501-02 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1167 , 117 S.Ct. 1429 , 137 L.Ed.2d 538 (1997).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dial Block Co. v. Mastro Masonry See, e.g., Maccaferri Gabions, Inc. v. Dynateria, Inc., 91 F. 3d 1431 , 1438 n. 6 (11th Cir.1996) (joint check arrangement did not create direct contractual relationship between general contractor and materialman under Miller Act), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1167 , 117 S.Ct. 1430 , 137 L.Ed. 2d 539 (1997); Light & Power, supra, 440 F. 2d at 478 (same); U.S. ex rel.