green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez de Guillen v. Saul
(ECF No. 26 at 5.) While this specific argument was not previously raised, a Rule 59(e) motion is not an appropriate vehicle for “advanc[ing] new arguments or supporting facts which were otherwise available for presentation when the original summary judgment motion was briefed.” Van Skiver, 952 F.2d at 1243 ; see also Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Servs., 101 F.3d 1324 , 1332 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1181 (1997) (Rule 59(e) does not permit losing party to present new legal theories or facts that could have been raised earlier.)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jensen v. Dunivent (In Re Dewey)
See, e.g., Brown v. Presbyterian Healthcare Servs., 101 F.3d 1324 , 1331 (10th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1181 , 117 S.Ct. 1461 , 137 L.Ed.2d 564 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
West
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 96-8253.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 14, 1997.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.