green
Positive treatment
8.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Daniel B.
This standard focuses on what act remains to be done to commit the intended crime and not what acts have been done.’’), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 916 , 692 A.2d 814 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 823 , 118 S .Ct. 81, 139 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia-Duarte
See United States v. Harvard, 103 F.3d 412, 420 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 82 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cales
See State v. Campfield, 44 Conn. App. 6, 24-25 , 687 A.2d 903 (1996), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 916 , 692 A.2d 814 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 823 , 118 S. Ct. 81 , 139 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Polk
See State v. Thomas, 344 N.C. 639 , 477 S.E.2d 450 (1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Angel Velazquez, Cross-Appellee/appellant
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654 (8th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angel Velazquez
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Angel Velazquez, Cross-Appellee/appellant
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angel Velazquez
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Morgan
See State v. Campfield, 44 Conn. App. 6, 18-19 , 687 A.2d 903 (1996), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 916 , 692 A.2d 814 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 823 , 118 S. Ct. 81 , 139 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. K.R.A.
See United States v. Female Juvenile, 103 F.3d 14, 17 (5th Cir.1996) (“It is nonsensical to suppose that as a defendant draws nearer the age of twenty-one, the allowable penalty that a court may impose for violation of probation shrinks correspondingly.”), cer t. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); see also United States v. G.C.A., 83 F.Supp.2d 253, 254-55 (D.P.R.2000) (concurring with Fifth Circuit’s analysis of § 5037).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. K.R.A.
See United States v. Female Juvenile, 103 F.3d 14, 17 (5th Cir. 1996) (“It is nonsensical to suppose that as a defendant draws nearer the age of twenty-one, the allowable penalty that a court may impose for violation of probation shrinks correspondingly."), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 (1997); see also United States v. G.C.A., 83 F. Supp.2d 253, 254-55 (D.
cited
Cited "see"
Saldano v. Cockrell
See generally Cooper v. Taylor, 70 F.3d 1454, 1462 (4th Cir.1995) aff'd on rehearing en banc, 103 F.3d 366 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Antonio Brown v. United States
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert A. Holman, Also Known as Birna Shaw
See United States v. Prior, 107 F.3d 654, 660 (8th Cir.) (one panel of this court is not at liberty to overrule another panel’s decision), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 84 , 139 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997); United States v. Bates, 77 F.3d 1101, 1103-04 (8th Cir.) (finding application of § 922(g) to defendant who merely possessed firearm that traveled in interstate commerce was “eminently constitutional”), cer t. denied, 519 U.S. 884 , 117 S.Ct. 215 , 136 L.Ed.2d 149 (1996); United States v. Shelton, 66 F.3d 991, 992 (8th Cir.1995) (per curiam) (to satisfy interstate commerce element of �…
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. School Administrative District No. 19
See Becerra v. Asher, 105 F.3d 1042, 1044 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 82 , 139 *67 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Hernandez-Guevara
See United States v. Jobe, 101 F.3d 1046, 1061 (5th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 81 , 139 L.Ed.2d 39 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Los Angeles News Service v. Reuters Television International, Limited Visnews International (Usa), Limited Reuters America Holdings, Inc. Reuters America, Inc., La News Service v. Reuters Television International, Limited Visnews International (Usa), Limited Reuters America Holdings, Inc. Reuters America, Inc.
(2×)
See Los Angeles News Serv. v. Reuters Television Int'l, Ltd., 942 F.Supp. 1265 , 1274 n. 7 (C.D.Cal.1996) ("Reuters I") 2 The decision is reported at 942 F.Supp. 1275 (C.D.Cal.1996) ("Reuters II") 3 No other circuits appear to have addressed this issue 4 Defendants' collateral estoppel argument rested on the summary judgment granted by another district court to the defendant in Los Angeles News Service v. KCAL-TV Channel 9, later reversed by this court. 108 F.3d 1119 (9th Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 81 , 139 L.Ed.2d 39 (1997).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Shane M.
See, e.g., State v. Campfield, 44 Conn. App. 6, 17 , 687 A.2d 903 (1996), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 916 , 692 A.2d 814 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 823 , 118 S. Ct. 81 , 139 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n
See e.g., Becerra v. Asher, 105 F.3d 1042, 1048 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 139 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ripellino v. SCHOOL BOARD ASS'N, INC.
See e.g., Becerra v. Asher, 105 F.3d 1042, 1048 , cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 82 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adrian Murphy
"Generally, we do not consider issues that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived in a plea agreement.” United States v. Goings, 200 F.3d 539, 543 (8th Cir.2000); see also United States v. Stuttley, 103 F.3d 684 , 686 (8th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 , 118 S.Ct. 83 , 139 L.Ed.2d 40 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adrian Murphy
"Generally, we do not consider issues that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived in a plea agreement." United States v. Goings, 200 F.3d 539, 543 (8th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Stuttley, 103 F.3d 684, 686 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 824 (1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Healthpartners of Southern Arizona, dba Partners Health Plan of Arizona, Inc.
v.
Atkins
v.
Atkins
No. 96-2051.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1997.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.