green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.8 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 1 distinct case ·
“Whether an impairment is substantially limiting is measured at the time of the requested accommodation.”
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wai v. Allstate Insurance
But see Ford v. Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601, 612 (3d Cir.1998) (holding that because plaintiff "received her disability benefits via her employment at Schering, she had no nexus to MetLife’s 'insurance office' and thus was not discriminated against in connection with a public accommodation”), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1084 , 119 S.Ct. 850 , 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999); Parker v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cox v. True North Energy, LLC.
whether an impairment is substantially limiting is measured at the time of the requested accommodation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Webster Bank v. Oakley
e . . . hold that title iii does not address the terms of the policies that sells
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kimber v. Thiokol Corporation
the disparity in benefits provided in the policy at issue is also not prohibited by the ada because the ada does not mandate equality between individuals with different disabilities.
discussed
Cited "see"
RHJ Medical Center, Inc. v. City of DuBois
(2×)
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 316-17 (5th Cir.1997) (holding that alcoholism is not a per se disability under the ADA and evidence that alcoholics, in general, are impaired is inadequate to show the substantial limitation of one or more major life activities), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1084, 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998). 29 .
cited
Cited "see"
Carpenter v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 320 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Regional Economic Community Action Program, Inc. v. City of Middletown
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 316-17 (5th Cir.1997) (holding that alcoholism is not a per se disability under the AIDA and evidence that alcoholics, in general, are impaired is inadequate to show the substantial limitation of one or more major life activities), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Regional Economic Community Action Program, Inc. v. City Of Middletown
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 316-17 (5th Cir.1997) (holding that alcoholism is not a per se disability under the ADA and evidence that alcoholics, in general, are impaired is inadequate to show the substantial limitation of one or more major life activities), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Regional Economic Community Action Program, Inc. v. City of Middletown
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 316-17 (5th Cir.1997) (holding that alcoholism is not a per se disability under the ADA and evidence that alcoholics, in general, are impaired is inadequate to show the substantial limitation of one or more major life activities), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Regional Economic Community Action Program, Inc. v. City Of Middletown
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 316-17 (5th Cir.1997) (holding that alcoholism is not a per se disability under the ADA and evidence that alcoholics, in general, are impaired is inadequate to show the substantial limitation of one or more major life activities), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hook v. Georgia-Gulf Corp.
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 313 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998); Also see Taylor v. Principal Financial Group, Inc., 93 F.3d 155, 161 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1029 , 117 S.Ct. 586 , 136 L.Ed.2d 515 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
McInnis v. Alamo Community College District
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 320 (5th Cir.1997), cert. denied 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see"
Renaud v. Wyoming Department of Family Services
See Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 316-17 (5th Cir.1997) (holding that alcoholism is not a per se disability under the ADA and evidence that alcoholics, in general, are impaired is inadequate to show the substantial limitation of one or more major life activities), ce rt. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998); see also Wallin v. Minnesota Dep’t of Corrections, 153 F.3d 681 , 686 n. 4 (8th Cir.1998) (citing Burch and requiring that a plaintiff show impairment of a major life activity), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 1141 , 143 L.Ed.2d 209 (1999); Buckl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shin v. University of Maryland Medical System Corp.
See Smith v. Amentech, 129 F.3d 857, 866 (6th Cir.1997); Sie berns v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 125 F.3d 1019, 1021-22 (7th Cir.1997); see also Burch v. Coca-Cola Co., 119 F.3d 305, 314 (5th Cir.1997) (recognizing that a reasonable accommodation claim under the ADA differs from a wrongful termination claim under the ADA), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 , 118 S.Ct. 871 , 139 L.Ed.2d 768 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
(2005)
See, e.g., Ayers v. Fordice, 111 F.3d 1183 , 1207-9 (5 th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1084 (1998) (policy governing nonresident fee waivers for children of alumni not traceable to de jure segregation); United States v. Louisiana, 9 F.3d at 1167 (questioning whether state's open admissions policy was traceable to de jure segregation); Knight, 900 F. Supp. at 337-39 (holding that lack of black studies program at TWI was not traceable to de jure segregation and noting that many HBCUs did not have such programs).
Crook
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 97-7180.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 20, 1998.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.