green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“the fact that plaintiffs incurred cleanup costs by complying "with a unilateral administrative order, without forcing the government to take them to court, does not change their status as jointly and severally hable parties.”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Centerior Service Company General Electric Company Ashland Oil, Incorporated v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal Corporation
the fact that plaintiffs incurred cleanup costs by complying "with a unilateral administrative order, without forcing the government to take them to court, does not change their status as jointly and severally hable parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
Durham Manufacturing Co. v. Merriam Manufacturing Co.
See Sun Company, Inc. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 124 F.3d 1187, 1192 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1113 , 118 S.Ct. 1045 , 140 L.Ed.2d 110 (1998) (holding that where none of the events for accrual of a § 113(f)(1) contribution claim can arise because a PRP has incurred response costs based on its agreement to remediate in accordance with a state agency’s administrative order, the relevant period of limitations and accrual is provided in § 113(g)(2).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Davis
See also Sun Co. v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 919 F.Supp. 1523 , 1532 (N.D.Okla.1996), rev’d in pari on other grounds 124 F.3d 1187 (10th Cir.1997), cert. denie d — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1045 , 140 L.Ed.2d 110 (1998).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Deaton
v.
Department of Agriculture
v.
Department of Agriculture
No. 97-996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.