green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“[i]n the absence of special definitions, statutory language can be measured by common understanding and practices or construed in the sense generally understood”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Because the judgment in question was entered by an Illinois state court, we apply Illinois rules of preclusion.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gold v. Gold (In Re Gold)
because the judgment in question was entered by an illinois state court, we apply illinois rules of preclusion.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Peavy v. WFAA-TV, Inc.
n the absence of special definitions, statutory language can be measured by common understanding and practices or construed in the sense generally understood
cited
Cited "see"
Porath v. State
See Reeves v. State, 969 S.W.2d 471, 483 (Tex.App.-Waco 1998, pet. ref'd), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 1462 , 143 L.Ed.2d 547 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Schorr v. Schorr (In Re Schorr)
See Caton v. Trudeau (Matter of Caton), 157 F.3d 1026, 1028 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 1462 , 143 L.Ed.2d 547 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Acclaim Entertainment, Inc.
See Davenport v. Community Corrections, 962 P.2d 963, 967 (Colo.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 1462 , 143 L.Ed.2d 547 (1999). a.
cited
Cited "see"
Castaldo v. Stone
See Davenport v. Community Corrections, 962 P.2d 963 (Colo.1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 1462 , 143 L.Ed.2d 547 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Steward Health Care Sys., LLC
Compare Bradley Ctr., Inc . v. Wessner , 161 Ga. App. 576 , 581-582, 287 S.E.2d 716 , aff'd, 250 Ga. 199 , 296 S.E.2d 693 (1982) (mental health facility owed duty of care to third parties arising out of its special relationship with patient because facility had sufficient control over patient who could not leave premises during his commitment without being issued leave pass), with Davenport v. Community Corrections of the Pikes Peak Region, Inc ., 962 P.2d 963 , 968 (Colo. 1998), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1068 , 119 S.Ct. 1462 , 143 L.Ed.2d 547 (1999) (private correction facility did not have dut…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dorothy M. MANTLE
v.
John R. MANTLE
v.
John R. MANTLE
No. 98-1343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · N.D. Texas (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.