green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. BFI Waste Services, LLC
See Dufrene v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 207 F.3d 264, 266 (5th Cir.) (describing day-rate employees as those employees who “were guaranteed a day’s pay, regardless of the hours worked that day”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 825 , 121 S.Ct. 72 , 148 L.Ed.2d 36 (2000) (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stewart
See United States v. Richards, 204 F.3d 177, 192 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 826 , 121 S.Ct. 73 , 148 L.Ed.2d 36 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee v. Vance Executive Protection, Inc.
Unquestionably, Vance Agents are “paid a flat sum for a day’s work ... without regard to the number of hours worked in the day.” 29 C.F.R. § 788.112 ; see also Dufrene v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., 207 F.3d 264, 266 (5th Cir.) (describing employees who “were guaranteed a day’s pay, regardless of the hours worked that day” as day-rate employees), cer t. denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 72 , 148 L.Ed.2d 36 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dufrene
v.
Browning-Ferris, Inc.
v.
Browning-Ferris, Inc.
No. 99-2043.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.