green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
6.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2002 ·
…attorneys' fees are recoverable under the tila, see 15 u.s.c. 1640 (a)(3), and would therefore appear to be recoverable in arbitration, as arbitrators possess the power to fashion the same relief as courts.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Boutin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
this court and others have held that testimony from former employees who had different supervisors than the plaintiff, who worked in different parts of the employer's company ... cannot be probative of whether age was a determinative factor in the plaintiffs discharge.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Snowden v. Checkpoint Check Cashing
attorneys' fees are recoverable under the tila, see 15 u.s.c. 1640 (a)(3), and would therefore appear to be recoverable in arbitration, as arbitrators possess the power to fashion the same relief as courts.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Snowden v. Checkpoint Check Cashing
attorneys' fees are recoverable under the tila, see 15 u.s.c. 1640 (a)(3), and would therefore appear to be recoverable in arbitration, as arbitrators possess the power to fashion the same relief as courts.
cited
Cited "see"
Wyoming v. United States Department of the Interior
See Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483, 493 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied 531 U.S. 1145 , 121 S.Ct. 1081 , 148 L.Ed.2d 957 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bluitt v. Houston Independent School District
Dist. 267 F.3d 426, 429 (5th Cir.2001); Lollar v. Baker, 196 F.3d 603, 607 (5th Cir.1999) (citing Texas v. Walker, 142 F.3d 813 , 818 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1102 , 119 S.Ct. 865 , 142 L.Ed.2d 768 (1999); Spuler v. Pickar, 958 F.2d 103, 107 (5th Cir.1992)); Brown v. Texas A & M Univ., 804 F.2d 327, 335 (5th Cir.1986); accord Bryan v. City of Madison, 213 F.3d 267, 275 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1145 , 121 S.Ct. 1081 , 148 L.Ed.2d 957 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bluitt v. Houston Independent School Dist.
Dist., 267 F.3d 426, 429 (5th Cir.2001); Lollar v. Baker, 196 F.3d 603, 607 (5th Cir.1999) (citing Texas v. Walker, 142 F.3d 813 , 818 (5th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1102 , 119 S.Ct. 865 , 142 L.Ed.2d 768 (1999); Spuler v. Pickar, 958 F.2d 103, 107 (5th Cir. 1992)); Brown v. Texas A & M Univ., 804 F.2d 327, 335 (5th Cir.1986); accord Bryan v. City of Madison, 213 F.3d 267, 275 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1145 , 121 S.Ct. 1081 , 148 L.Ed.2d 957 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pratt v. City of Houston TX
See Arnold v. United States Dep’t of the Interi- or, 213 F.3d 193, 196 (5th Cir.2000)("among multiple job applicants who fail to secure the position because of discrimination, only those who can prove that they would have gotten the position but for the discrimination can recover compensatory damages.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1080 , 148 L.Ed.2d 957 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
GDF Realty Investments, Ltd. v. Norton
See, e.g., Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483, 497 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1081 , 148 L.Ed.2d 957 (2001) ("Congress undoubtedly has the constitutional authority to pass legislation for the conservation of endangered species.”); National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Babbitt, 130 F.3d 1041 , 1057 (D.C.Cir.1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 937 , 118 S.Ct. 2340 , 141 L.Ed.2d 712 (1998) ("NAHB ”) ("We hold that section 9(a)(1) of the Endangered Species Act is within Congress’ Commerce Clause power.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Canavan
See, e.g., Gibbs v. Babbitt, 214 F.3d 483 (4th Cir.2000), cert. denied sub nom Gibbs v. Norton, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1081 , 148 L.Ed.2d 957 (2001) (regulation governing taking of red wolves on private land satisfies Lopez’s “substantially affects commerce” test).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
New Pulaski Company Limited Partnership
v.
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
v.
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
No. 00-759.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2) · S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.