green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.3 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2003 · 3 courts ·
…it is well-settled that once a student graduates, he no longer has a live case or controversy justifying declaratory and injunctive relief against a school's action or policy.
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Donovan v. Punxsutawney Area School Board
it is well-settled that once a student graduates, he no longer has a live case or controversy justifying declaratory and injunctive relief against a school's action or policy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Donovan v. Punxsutawney Area School Board
it is well-settled that once a student graduates, he no longer has a live case or controversy justifying declaratory and in-junctive relief against a school's action or policy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mellen v. Bunting
it is well-settled that once a student graduates, he no longer has a live case or controversy justifying declaratory and injunctive relief against a school's action or policy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Neil J. Mellen Paul S. Knick v. Josiah Bunting, Iii, in His Individual Capacity and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent, Virginia Military Institute, Specialty Research Associates, Inc. First Principles, Inc. Coalition of American Veterans, Inc. Naval Aviation Foundation, Inc. The National Legal Foundation, Amici Supporting Americans United for Separation of Church and State Anti-Defamation League the American Jewish Committee, Amici Supporting Neil J. Mellen Paul S. Knick v. Josiah Bunting, Iii, in His Individual Capacity and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent, Virginia Military Institute, Americans United for Separation of Church and State Anti-Defamation League the American Jewish Committee, Amici Supporting Specialty Research Associates, Inc. First Principles, Inc. Coalition of American Veterans, Inc. Naval Aviation Foundation, Inc. The National Legal Foundation, Amici Supporting
it is well-settled that once a student graduates, he no longer has a live case or controversy justifying declaratory and injunctive relief against a school's action or policy.
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. Pope
See SEC v. Infinity Group Co., 212 F.3d 180 , 187 n. 9 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 905 , 121 5.Ct. 1228, 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001); SEC v. Life Partners, Inc., 87 F.3d 536, 544 (D.C.Cir.1996); Teague v. Bakker, 35 F.3d 978 , 986 n. 8 (4th Cir.1994); Revak v. SEC Realty Co., 18 F.3d 81, 88 (2d Cir.l994)(rejecting broad vertical commonality).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Moore
See MCFL, 479 U.S. at 249-50 , 107 S.Ct. 616 . 15 Following the logic of amici's argument, any laudatory phrase uttered in connection with a candidate's name during election season would be the equivalent of "Smith for Congress." We think that this broad interpretation of express advocacy runs counter to the Supreme Court's stated concerns about the overbreadth of government regulation of political speech See Buckley, 424 U.S. at 42-43, 64-67, 80 , 96 S.Ct. 612 . 16 Cf. Perry v. Bartlett, 231 F.3d 155, 159-61 (4th Cir.2000) (finding that advertisements that were critical of certain candidates …
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re. Ikon v. City of Philadelphia
See Central Bank, 511 U.S. at 191 , 114 5.Ct. at 1455. 6 To establish securities fraud, plaintiffs must establish a more exacting threshold of scienter — “a mental state embracing intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud,” Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 193 n. 12, 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 1381 n. 12, 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976), or, at a minimum, “highly unreasonable (conduct), involving not merely simple, or even inexcusable negligence, but an extreme departure from the standards of ordinary care, ... which presents a danger of misleading buyers or sellers that is either known to the de…
cited
Cited "see"
Prichard v. Kurucz
See SEC v. Infinity Group Co., 212 F.3d 180, 196 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 1228 , 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. SG Ltd.
See SEC v. Infinity Group Co., 212 F.3d 180, 187-88 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1228 , 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001); SEC v. Life Partners, Inc., 87 F.3d 536, 543 (D.C.Cir.1996); Wals v. Fox Hills Dev.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Intelligroup Securities Litigation
To successfully plead scienter, a securities plaintiff must plead “conscious misbehavior or recklessness.” GSC, 368 F.3d at 236 ; see also SEC v. Infinity Group Co., 212 F.3d 180, 192 (3d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 905 , 121 S.Ct. 1228 , 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply
This Court reversed the RICO verdict for the plaintiffs, concluding that the alleged RICO scheme ended once the defendant had sold all of his lots to the plaintiffs, and therefore it was “insufficiently protracted to qualify as a RICO violation.” Id. at 311 ; see also Efron v. Embassy Suites (Puerto Rico), Inc., 223 F.3d 12, 19 (1st Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 905 , 121 S.Ct. 1228 , 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001) (where the plaintiff alleged a pattern of racketeering acts focused on coercing him into relinquishing his ownership interest in a real estate development project, the court charact…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Applegate v. United States
See, e.g., Perry v. Bartlett, 231 F.3d 155, 163 (4th Cir.2000) (finding the district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding attorneys fees to a prevailing party for an earlier, unsuccessful interlocutory appeal), ce rt. denied, 532 U.S. 905 , 121 S.Ct. 1229 , 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001); Conte at § 4.18 (citing cases).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Transit Sales, Inc. v. Banco Popular De Puerto Rico, Inc.
See e.g., Efrón v. Embassy Suites (Puerto Rico), Inc., 223 F.3d 12, 17-19 (1st Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 905 , 121 S.Ct. 1228 , 149 L.Ed.2d 138 (2001); see also, M & I Heat Transfer Products, Ltd. v. Willke, 131 F.Supp.2d 256, 260-61 (D.Mass.2001)(describing the requirements to establish “pattern” under RICO, in particular the element of “continuity”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Efron
v.
Embassy Suites (Puerto Rico), Inc.
v.
Embassy Suites (Puerto Rico), Inc.
No. 00-1069.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 2001.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.