Levi Strauss & Co. v. United States, 532 U.S. 906 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Levi Strauss & Co. v. United States, 532 U.S. 906 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a failure to exhaust administrative remedies may be excused when the claimant advances a constitutional challenge unsuitable for determination in an administrative proceeding, or when the unexhausted remedy is plainly inadequate”
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scott Beemer v. Eric Holder, Jr. (ca5, 2012-10-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Scott Beemer v. Eric Holder, Jr.
5th Cir. · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a failure to exhaust administrative remedies may be excused when the claimant advances a constitutional challenge unsuitable for determination in an administrative proceeding, or when the unexhausted remedy is plainly inadequate
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Levi Strauss & Co.
v.
United States
No. 00-1156.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 2001.
532 U.S. 906
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.