green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Pool Products Distribution Market Antitrust Litigation
See United States v. Microsoft, 253 F.3d 34, 81 (D.C.Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 952 , 122 S.Ct. 350 , 151 L.Ed.2d 264 (2001) (addressing market definition for dangerous probability of success element first).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See Mentavlos v. Anderson, 249 F.3d 301 , 312 n. 4 (4th Cir.) (explaining that “a panel of this court cannot over-rule, explicitly or implicitly, the precedent set by a prior panel of this court”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 952 , 122 S.Ct. 349 , 151 L.Ed.2d 264 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Cabrera
Under 28 U.S.C. § 455 (a) (2012), a judge “shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” The party moving for disqualification of the judge must make “a showing of an appearance of bias or prejudice sufficient to permit the average citizen reasonably to question a judge’s impartiality is all that must be demonstrated to compel recu-sal.” United States v. Bostick, 791 F.3d 127, 155 (D.C.Cir.2015) (quoting United States v. Heldt, 668 F.2d 1238, 1271 (D.C.Cir.1981)); see also SEC v. Loving Spirit Found., Inc., 392 F.3d 486, 493 (D…
Richard
v.
Ohio
v.
Ohio
No. 01-207.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 2001.
Published
Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.