green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2002 ·
…beyond assessing the purpose expressly articulated by the state, we ensure that the stated secular purpose is legitimate by also examining the context and the content of the display.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Adland v. Russ
beyond assessing the purpose expressly articulated by the state, we ensure that the stated secular purpose is legitimate by also examining the context and the content of the display.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Adland v. Russ
beyond assessing the purpose expressly articulated by the state, we ensure that the stated secular purpose is legitimate by also examining the context and the content of the display.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pylant v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
See Delta Family-Care Disability and Survivorship Plan v. Mar *828 shall, 258 F.3d 834, 841 (8th Cir.2001) (explaining that a decision to deny benefits need not be the only sensible one, as long as a reasoned explanation based on the evidence is offered for the outcome), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Sue Shipley v. Arkansas Blue Cross And Blue Shield
See Delta Family-Care Disability and Survivorship Plan v. Marshall, 258 F.3d 834, 840-41 (8th Cir.2001) (reviewing de novo district court's application of abuse of discretion standard in its review of an ERISA plan administrator's decision to terminate benefits), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shipley v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield
See Delta Family-Care Disability and Survivorship Plan v. Marshall, 258 F.3d 834, 840-41 (8th Cir.2001) (reviewing de novo district court’s application of abuse of discretion standard in its review- of an ERISA plan administrator’s decision to terminate benefits), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glassroth v. Moore
See Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. O’Bannon, 259 F.3d 766, 772 (7th Cir.2001) (recognizing additional religious significance when the Commandments are presented as tablet-shaped blocks), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
John A. Jackson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938); accord Delta Family-Care Disability & Survivorship Plan v. Marshall, 258 F.3d 834, 841 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andy Modrovich James Moore v. Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
(2×)
See also Ind. Civil Liberties Union v. O'Bannon, 259 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002) (following Elkhart and holding that the state's intention to erect a monument depicting the Ten Commandments on the park-like grounds of the statehouse would violate the Establishment Clause). 70 Finally, in ACLU Nebraska Foundation v. City of Plattsmouth, 358 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir.2004), the Eighth Circuit held that the city's display of a Ten Commandments monument in a public park since 1965 amounted to unconstitutional government endorsement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freethought Society v. Chester County
See also Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. O’Bannon, 259 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002) (following Books and holding that the state’s acceptance of a monument containing the Ten Commandments which would have been placed in a prominent position on the Indiana Statehouse grounds to replace a monument donated by the Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1958 and destroyed in 1991 by a vandal would violate the Establishment Clause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Freethought Society, Of Greater Philadelphia v. Chester County
See also Indiana Civil Liberties Union v. O'Bannon, 259 F.3d 766 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1162 , 122 S.Ct. 1173 , 152 L.Ed.2d 117 (2002) (following Books and holding that the state's acceptance of a monument containing the Ten Commandments which would have been placed in a prominent position on the Indiana Statehouse grounds to replace a monument donated by the Fraternal Order of Eagles in 1958 and destroyed in 1991 by a vandal would violate the Establishment Clause).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
O'Bannon, Governor of Indiana
v.
Indiana Civil Liberties Union
v.
Indiana Civil Liberties Union
No. 01-966.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.