Vencor, Inc. v. Helwig, 536 U.S. 935 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Vencor, Inc. v. Helwig, 536 U.S. 935 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Sepracor, Inc. Securities Litigation (mad, 2004-03-11)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In Re Sepracor, Inc. Securities Litigation (2×)
D. Mass. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 557 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002); Rubinstein v. Collins, 20 F.3d 160, 166 (5th Cir.1994); In re Wells Fargo Sec.
cited Cited "see" Larsen v. Cigna Healthcare Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Corporate Health Ins., Inc. v. Texas Dept. of Ins., 215 F.3d 526 (5th Cir.2000), vacated and remanded by, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2617 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Daniel Chen v. Navarre Corporation (2×)
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 552 (6th Cir.2001) (setting forth nine factors usually relevant to scienter), cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002); Greebel, 194 F.3d at 196-98 (same).
discussed Cited "see" In RE: NAVARRE CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION DANIEL CHEN, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, — JUDY POUCHER, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ADVANCED DATA CONCEPTS STEVE CHAHINE LEE TACHMAN v. NAVARRE CORP. ERIC H. PAULSON CHARLES E. CHENEY ALFRED TEO DICKINSON G. WILTZ JAMES G. SIPPL MICHAEL L. SNOW, — (2×)
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 552 (6th Cir.2001) (setting forth nine factors usually relevant to scienter), cert. dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002); Greebel, 194 F.3d at 196-98 (same);.
discussed Cited "see" Chen v. Navarre Corp. (2×)
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 552 (6th Cir.2001) (setting forth nine factors usually relevant to scienter), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002); Greebel, 194 F.3d at 196-98 (same);.
discussed Cited "see" In re Navarre Corp. Securities Litigation (2×)
8th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 552 (6th Cir.2001) (setting forth nine factors usually relevant to scienter), cert. dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002); Greebel, 194 F.3d at 196-98 (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ansfield v. Omnicare, Inc. (In Re Omicare, Inc. Securities Litigation)
6th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
KBC claims that “this [c]ourt may consider ‘not only those documents referenced in the plaintiffs’ complaint, but also documents filed with the SEC.’ ” Appellant MJN at 5 (quoting Helwig v. Vencor, 210 F.3d 612 , 618 n. 10 (6th Cir.2000), rev’d on other grounds, 251 F.3d 540 (6th Cir.2001) (en banc), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002)); see also id. at 5 n. 2 (citing, inter alia, Kramer v. Time Warner, Inc., 937 F.2d 767, 774 (2d Cir.1991)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Illinois v. Julia Cruz
7th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
As noted by the Ninth Circuit, "[t]he new provision closely resembles ERISA's express preemption provision, and precedent interpreting the ERISA provision thus provides authority for cases involving the FEHBA provision." Botsford, 314 F.3d at 393-94 ; see also Corporate Health Ins., Inc. v. Tex. Dep't of Ins., 215 F.3d 526, 539 (5th Cir.2000), vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 2617 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Illinois v. Cruz
7th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
As noted by the Ninth Circuit, "[t]he new provision closely resembles ERISA’s express preemption provision, and precedent interpreting the ERISA, provision thus provides authority for cases involving the FEHBA provision.” Botsford, 314 F.3d at 393-94 ; see also Corporate Health Ins., Inc. v. Tex. Dep't of Ins., 215 F.3d 526, 539 (5th Cir.2000), vacated on other grounds, 536 U.S. 935 , 122 S.Ct. 2617 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gompper v. Visx, Inc. (2×)
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 553 (6th Cir.2001) (en banc), cert. dismissed, - U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002) (PSLRA’s strong inference requirement “means that plaintiffs are entitled only to the most plausible of competing inferences.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gompper v. Visx (2×)
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Helwig v. Vencor, Inc., 251 F.3d 540, 553 (6th Cir.2001) (en banc), cert. dismissed, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2616 , 153 L.Ed.2d 800 (2002) (PSLRA's strong inference requirement "means that plaintiffs are entitled only to the most plausible of competing inferences.").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vencor, Inc., Et Al.
v.
Helwig Et Al.
01-538.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2002.
536 U.S. 935
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.1.