Harlow Corp. v. Norton, Sec'y of the Interior, 539 U.S. 959 (2003).

Harlow Corp. v. Norton, Sec'y of the Interior, 539 U.S. 959 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 1.1 score

2 citation events across 1 distinct court.

Strongest positive: Akee v. Dow Chemical Co. (hid, 2003-07-21)

Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.

D. Haw. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2642 , 156 L.Ed.2d 657 (2003) (claim that manufacturer failed to warn general public of pesticide hazards is a preempted labeling claim); Ebling, 723 N.E.2d at 896 (claim that pesticide registrant had a duty to provide purchasers with sufficient product labeling or information for downstream distribution of warnings to non-purchasers is a challenge to product labeling); but see Burt v. Fumigation Serv. & Supply, Inc., 926 F.Supp. 624 (W.D.Mich.1996) (bystanders' *1134 claim that pest…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Akee v. Dow Chemical Co.

D. Haw. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low

See, e.g., Eyl v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 264 Neb. 582 , 650 N.W.2d 744 (2002), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 2642 , 156 L.Ed.2d 657 (2003) (claim that manufacturer failed to warn general public of pesticide hazards is a preempted labeling claim); Ebling, 723 N.E.2d at 896 (claim that pesticide registrant had a duty to provide purchasers with sufficient product labeling or information for downstream distribution of warnings to non-purchasers is a challenge to product labeling); but see Burt v. Fumigation Serv. & Supply, Inc., 926 F.Supp. 624 (W.D.Mich.1996) (by standers’ claim that pesticide…