green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re: Charter Oak Associates, Debtor. Neal Ossen, Trustee v. Department of Social Services, State of Connecticut
But see Hood v. Tenn. Student Assistance Corp. (In re Hood), 319 F.3d 755, 767-68 (6th Cir.) (holding that § 106(a) is constitutional), cert. granted, Tenn. Student Assistance Corp. v. Hood, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 45 , 156 L.Ed.2d 703 (2003) (Mem).
discussed
Cited "see"
A.M., a Minor v. Jerry Butler, Superintendent of the Illinois Youth Center
See Alvarado v. Hickman, 316 F.3d 841, 851 (9th Cir.2002), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 45 , 156 L.Ed.2d 703 (2003) (age was a factor in determining whether reasonable person would have felt at liberty to terminate the interrogation and leave); United States v. Erving L., 147 F.3d 1240, 1248 (10th Cir.1998) ("Given these facts, a reasonable juvenile in E.L.'s position would not have believed that the officers had curtailed his freedom of movement to a degree associated with formal arrest.") (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
M., A. v. Butler, Jerry
See Alvarado v. Hickman, 316 F.3d 841, 851 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. granted, 156 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana Department of Revenue v. Williams
See Hood v. Tennessee Student Assistance Corp., 319 F.3d 755 (6th Cir.2003), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 45 , 156 L.Ed.2d 703 (2003) (No. 02-1606).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooper v. McGrath
The error must have resulted in “actual prejudice.” Id. (citation omitted); see, e.g., Alvarado v. Hickman, 316 F.3d 841, 855-57 (9th Cir.), cert. granted, Yarborough v. Alvarado, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 45 , 156 L.Ed.2d 703 (2003) (finding Brecht prejudice where confession obtained in violation of Miranda was admitted at trial even though defendant testified at trial; defendant’s testimony could be disregarded because decision to testify was a tactical choice likely influenced by the prosecutor’s use of the confession, and the remaining testimonial evidence was inconsistent or only marg…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Randall C. SCARBOROUGH
v.
Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
v.
Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
No. 02-1657.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 30, 2003.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.