discussed Cited "see" Aaron Deroo v. United States See Singleton v. Norris, 319 F.3d 1018, 1023 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (“[A] habeas petition raising a claim that had not arisen at the time of a previous petition is not barred by § 2244(b) or as an abuse of the writ.”), cert. denied 540 U.S. 832 , 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 59 (2003).

cited Cited "see" United States v. William T. Carter See United States v. Tirado, 313 F.3d 437, 440 (8th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 832 , 124 S.Ct. 73 , 157 L.Ed.2d 59 (2003).

discussed Cited "see" James Dwight Thomas v. James Crosby (2×) See Singleton v. Norris, 319 F.3d 1018, 1023 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (“§ 2254 is the only means by which ‘a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court’ may raise challenges to the validity of his conviction or sentence or to the execution of his sentence.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 59 (2003); Crouch v. Norris, 251 F.3d 720, 723 (8th Cir.2001) (“Not only is § 2254 an appropriate vehicle for Crouch’s proposed claims, it is, as a practical matter, the only vehicle.”).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Novosel See also United States v. Werner, 317 F.3d 1168, 1170 (10th Cir.) (“Government promises in a plea agreement must be fulfilled to maintain the integrity of the plea”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 74 , 157 L.Ed.2d 59 (2003).