green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
“persons who have been convicted of serious sex offenses do not have a fundamental right to be free from . . . registration and notification requirements. . . .”
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Genson
persons who have been convicted of serious sex offenses do not have a fundamental right to be free from . . . registration and notification requirements. . . .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hernandez
persons who have been convicted of serious sex offenses do not have a fundamental right to be free from ... registration and notification requirements ....
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe, SORB No. 474362 v. Sex Offender Registry Board
See Doe v. Tandeske , 361 F.3d 594 , 597 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 817 , 125 S.Ct. 56 , 160 L.Ed.2d 25 (2004) (no right "to be free from the registration and notification requirements" of Alaska's sex offender registry statute); A.A. v. New Jersey , 341 F.3d 206 , 211-214 (3d Cir. 2003) (New Jersey's law providing for notification, including on Internet, of sex offender's home address does not violate fundamental privacy rights).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Doe
v.
Tandeske, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Public Safety
v.
Tandeske, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Public Safety
03-1652.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Kansas (1) · E.D. Michigan (1)
DOE ET AL.
v.
TANDESKE, COMMISSIONER, ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL.
No. 03-1652.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 361 F. 3d 594.