green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
21.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 ·
…person" under fifth amendment does not include "nonresident aliens who have insufficient contacts with the united states
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 ·
…the supreme court has long held that non-resident aliens who have insufficient contacts with the united states are not entitled to fifth amendment protections.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rasul v. Myers
(4×)
the supreme court has long held that non-resident aliens who have insufficient contacts with the united states are not entitled to fifth amendment protections.
discussed
Cited "see"
Winchester v. City of Hopkinsville
See id. (citing Brenneman v. MedCentral Health Sys., 366 F.3d 412 , 416 n. 2 (6th Cir.2004) (“Thus, while this post hoc, additional ground for plaintiffs termination may be relevant to the calculation of any damages, it is irrelevant to the determination of whether defendant improperly terminated plaintiff under the ADA or the FMLA in the first instance.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1300 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005); Cavin v. Honda of Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mirna Serrano v. Cintas Corporation
See Brenneman v. MedCentral Health Sys., 366 F.3d 412 , 416 n. 2 (6th Cir.2004) (“Thus, while this post hoc, additional ground for plaintiffs termination may be relevant to the calculation of any damages, it is irrelevant to the determination of whether defendant improperly terminated plaintiff under the ADA or the FMLA in the first instance.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1300 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005); Cavin v. Honda of Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Smithfield Packing Co., Inc.
“The critical question is whether the information imparted to the employer is sufficient to reasonably apprise it of the employee’s request to take time off for a serious health condition.” Manuel v. Westlake Polymers Corp., 66 F.3d 758 (5th Cir.1995)(emphasis added); see Brenneman v. MedCentral Health Sys., 366 F.3d 412, 421 (6th Cir.2004)(requiring that notice be “reasonably adequate to apprise the employer of the employee’s request to take leave for a serious health condition that rendered him unable to perform his job”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1300 , 161 L.Ed.2…
cited
Cited "see"
Viener v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)
See Jacobs v. Viener, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1300 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Holber v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)
See Jacobs v. Viener, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1300 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. AUTOZONERS, LLC
A chronic serious health condition involves (1) “periodic visits to a health care provider for treatment;” (2) a continuing condition “over an extended period of time — including recurring episodes of the underlying condition;” and (3) which “may be episodic, as with asthma, rather than continuing.” Fink v. Ohio Health Corp., 139 Fed.Appx. 667, 670 (6th Cir.2005); see also Brenneman v. MedCentral Health Sys., 366 F.3d 412, 421 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1300 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rasul v. Myers
See People’s Mojahedin, 182 F.3d at 22 ; 32 County Sovereignty Comm. v. U.S. Dep’t of State, 292 F.3d 797, 799 (D.C.Cir.2002); see also Jifry v. FAA, 370 F.3d 1174, 1182 (D.C.Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1299 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005); Pauling, 278 F.2d at 254 n. 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rasul v. Myers
See People’s Mojahedin, 182 F.3d at 22 ; 32 County Sovereignty Comm. v. U.S. Dep’t of State, 292 F.3d 797, 799 (D.C.Cir.2002); see also Jifry v. FAA, 370 F.3d 1174, 1182 (D.C.Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1146 , 125 S.Ct. 1299 , 161 L.Ed.2d 107 (2005); Pauling, 278 F.2d at 254 n. 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hudson
v.
American Arbitration Assn., Inc.
v.
American Arbitration Assn., Inc.
No. 04-697.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (4)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.