green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
12.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2012–2016 ·
…a review of the relevant case law in this jurisdiction reveals that plaintiffs with garden-variety claims generally receive between 30,000 and 125,000.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bouveng v. NYG Capital LLC
a review of the relevant case law in this jurisdiction reveals that plaintiffs with garden-variety claims generally receive between 30,000 and 125,000.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
MacMillan v. Millennium Broadway Hotel
a review of the relevant case law in this jurisdiction reveals that plaintiffs with garden-variety claims generally receive between 30,000 and 125,000.
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. City of New York
See Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 78 (2d Cir.2004) (collecting cases and affirming mental anguish damages award of $125,000), vacated on other grounds by KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005); Rainone v. Potter, 388 F.Supp.2d 120, 122-24 (E.D.N.Y.2005) (discussing spectrum of damages awards appropriate to compensate for mental anguish).
discussed
Cited "see"
Larkin v. Martin
E.g., Simms v. Village of Albion, 115 F.3d 1098, 1109 (2d Cir.1997) ("party who fails to object to jury instructions or to the substance of special verdict questions to be put to the jury has no right to object to those matters on appeal”); Metromedia Co. v. Fugazy, 983 F.2d 350, 363 (2d Cir.1992) ("party who failed to object, before the juiy retired, to the substance of special verdict questions to be put to the jury has no right to object to such matters on appeal”); see Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, 381 F.3d 56, 69 (2d Cir.2004) ("party is not entitled to challenge on appea…
cited
Cited "see"
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
See 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Clements v. Maloney
See Akins v. Kenney, 341 F.3d 681, 687 (8th Cir.2003), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1723 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
(2×)
See Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 62 (2d Cir.2004) ("Meacham"), vacated and remanded by KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
(2×)
See Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 62 (2d Cir.2004) (“Meacham”), vacated and remanded by KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Holloway v. Arkansas State Board of Architects
See Holloway v. Arkansas State Bd. of Architects, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1725 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
examined
Cited "see"
Keith Cross and Alfred Francis v. New York City Transit Authority and Gregory Warren, Docket No. 04-2912-Cv
(3×)
See Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins, 507 U.S. 604, 614 , 113 S.Ct. 1701 , 123 L.Ed.2d 338 (1993) (noting that ADEA violation is “ ‘willful’ if the employer knew or showed reckless disregard for the matter of whether its conduct was prohibited by the ADEA” (quoting Trans World Airlines v. Thurston, 469 U.S. 111, 126 , 105 S.Ct. 613 , 83 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985)) (internal quotation marks omitted)); accord Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 76-77 (2d Cir.2004) (citing Hazen Paper v. Biggins, 507 U.S. at 614 , 113 S.Ct. 1701 ), vacated on other grounds by KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, — U…
cited
Cited "see"
Samar Akins v. Michael L. Kenney, Warden of the Nebraska State Penitentiary
See Akins v. Kenney, 341 F.3d 681 (8th Cir.2003), cert. granted and judgment vacated by — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1723 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donlin v. Philips Lighting North America Corp.
See, e.g., Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 79 (2d Cir.2004) (affirming a district court’s award of front pay for 9-12.5 years to victims of age discrimination), vacated on other grounds sub nom KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005); Pierce v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donlin v. Philips Lighting North America Corp.
See, e.g., Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 79 (2d Cir.2004) (affirming a district court’s award of front pay for 9-12.5 years to victims of age discrimination), vacated on other grounds sub nom KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005); Pierce v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Junction Pool Commons, Inc.
See, e.g., Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Lab., 381 F.3d 56 , 68, 78 (2d Cir.2004) (noting that New York discrimination awards range from $30,000 or below to “more than $100,000 without discussion of protracted suffering, truly egregious conduct, or medical treatment,” and rejecting the defendant’s challenge to a remittitur order of $125,000 for mental anguish to plaintiffs “who had not offered evidence of treatment or physical sequelae”) vacated and remanded on other grounds, KAPL, Inc. v. Meacham, 544 U.S. 957 , 125 S.Ct. 1731 , 161 L.Ed.2d 596 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blaisdell
v.
City of Rochester, New Hampshire
v.
City of Rochester, New Hampshire
04-1.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 4, 2005.
Cited by 32 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (2)
BLAISDELL
v.
CITY OF ROCHESTER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.
No. 04-1.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 4, 2005.
1
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., ante, p. 280.