green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Capshaw v. Commonwealth
In interpreting the Confrontation Clause, the United States Supreme Court has “never held-or even suggested-that the longstanding rules restricting the use of specific instances and extrinsic evidence to impeach a witness’s credibility pose constitutional problems.” Hogan v. Hanks, 97 F.3d 189, 191 (7th Cir.1996), cert, denied, 520 U.S. 1171 , 117 S.Ct. 1439 , 137 L.Ed.2d 546 (1997); see also White v. Coplan, 399 F.3d 18, 25 (1st Cir.2005), cert, denied, 546 U.S. 972 , 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 384 (2005); Raines, 118 S.W.3d 205 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Brien v. Marshall
Compare White v. Coplan, 399 F.3d 18, 24-25 (1st Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 478 , 163 L.Ed.2d 384 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Merck & Co., Inc.
v.
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
v.
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
No. 05-236.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 2005.
Connor, Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Justice O’Connor, and Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.