green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mims v. Ivey (INMATE 1)
See Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1, 4 , 123 S.Ct. 1160, 1163 , 155 L.Ed.2d 98 (2003).” Doe v. Moore, 410 F.3d 1337,1340 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, John Doe I v. Moore, 546 U.S. 1003 , 126 S.Ct. 624 , 163 L.Ed.2d 506 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fredi Alonzo Torres
See Doe v. Moore, 410 F.3d 1337 , 1349 n. 10 (11th Cir.) (refusing to consider an issue not raised sufficiently in the initial brief), cert den., - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 624 , 163 L.Ed.2d 506 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Celerino Campos-Diaz
See Doe v. Moore, 410 F.3d 1337, 1346 (11th Cir.2005) (“Group classification by legislative act will be analyzed under [ ] strict scrutiny if the classification infringes fundamental rights or concerns a suspect class.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 624 , 163 L.Ed.2d 506 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
JJF v. State
See also Doe v. Moore, 410 F.3d 1337, 1345 (11th Cir.2005) (publication of truthful information already available to the public does not infringe upon liberty and privacy interests), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 624 , 163 L.Ed.2d 506 (2005). [¶ 20] The Smith court also concluded that Alaska’s Act did not have a severe impact upon the personal liberties of registrants.
Richard SNYDER, et ux.
v.
Ellen W. COSBY
v.
Ellen W. COSBY
No. 05-297.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 7, 2005.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.